K
knowmoor
For YEARS this has bugged me, so I figure I'll finally pose the question.
In Windows, at least any version after 3.x, why is it there seems to be an
arbitrary order in which background apps are loaded in startup. Both my
machines do this (one XP Home, the other XP Pro), as does my wife's Win2K
laptop. It's not completely random; on this machine, for instance, the
popup stopper software always loads first, while everything else (firewall,
a/v, HP printer controls, sound controls, etc.) that follows IS random.
Why?
Can the bootup procedure be organized so that apps load in the same sequence
every time? I would think that it would be best if ZA Pro finishes loading
first, for example, rather than sometimes being second (the popup app being
always first), then last, then whenever. I really don't know if it matters
(is the machine really capable of accepting info from the internet prior to
completion of the startup--I don't know), but it still seems rather Mickey
(as in the mouse) that Windows can't better organize the bootup order, at
least in its default state.
Any information that help fill this admittedly incomplete brain would be
appreciated.
In Windows, at least any version after 3.x, why is it there seems to be an
arbitrary order in which background apps are loaded in startup. Both my
machines do this (one XP Home, the other XP Pro), as does my wife's Win2K
laptop. It's not completely random; on this machine, for instance, the
popup stopper software always loads first, while everything else (firewall,
a/v, HP printer controls, sound controls, etc.) that follows IS random.
Why?
Can the bootup procedure be organized so that apps load in the same sequence
every time? I would think that it would be best if ZA Pro finishes loading
first, for example, rather than sometimes being second (the popup app being
always first), then last, then whenever. I really don't know if it matters
(is the machine really capable of accepting info from the internet prior to
completion of the startup--I don't know), but it still seems rather Mickey
(as in the mouse) that Windows can't better organize the bootup order, at
least in its default state.
Any information that help fill this admittedly incomplete brain would be
appreciated.