Topics on Electronics

[sona]

Electronics is the field of manipulating electrical currents and
voltages using passive and active components that are connected
together to create circuits. Electronic circuits range from a simple
load resistor that converts a current to a voltage, to computer
central-processing units (CPUs) that can contain more than a million
transistors. The following indices and documents provide a basic
reference for understanding electronic components, circuits, and
applications.

http://electronicstopics.blogspot.com/2008/10/welcome-to-world-of-electronics.html

 

[Pegasus \(MVP\)]

Pure spam plus a lot of nonsense, e.g. this statement: "resistors convert a
current to a voltage"

 

[DDW]

Pure spam plus a lot of nonsense, e.g. this statement: "resistors convert a
current to a voltage"

Another orphan (subject changed) post.

Don'tcha think most people know "spam" when they see it?

DDW

 

[Unknown]

Unfortunately no!

Another orphan (subject changed) post.

Don'tcha think most people know "spam" when they see it?

DDW

 

[DDW]

Unfortunately no!

Well, if they're using a newsreader, changing the subject to "Spam"
ain't gonna do anything to help that. The offending post is off
somewhere else, not to be seen.

Changing the subject and posting something about the unquoted poster
does absolutely nothing. At least quote the email address of the
offender, huh???

Another orphan (subject changed) post.

Don'tcha think most people know "spam" when they see it?

DDW

DDW

 

[Pegasus \(MVP\)]

Well, if they're using a newsreader, changing the subject to "Spam"
ain't gonna do anything to help that. The offending post is off
somewhere else, not to be seen.

Changing the subject and posting something about the unquoted poster
does absolutely nothing. At least quote the email address of the
offender, huh???

Flagging a spammer's post serves a purpose: It defaces his post which makes
it unattractive to potential readers. Most spammers give up quickly when
they see their spam message defaced within five minutes of posting.

Spammers don't quote valid EMail addresses - they give site URLs that they
want you to visit. Quoting these URLs would be doing them a favour.

 

[Tom [Pepper] Willett]

: it unattractive to potential readers. Most spammers give up quickly when
: they see their spam message defaced within five minutes of posting.

Oh for cryin' out loud. How many spammers do you think actually come back
and see their spam message? Where do you get the five minutes? Do you
think the spammers actually care that someone calls it spam?

Naive.

 

[DDW]

: it unattractive to potential readers. Most spammers give up quickly when
: they see their spam message defaced within five minutes of posting.

Oh for cryin' out loud. How many spammers do you think actually come back
and see their spam message? Where do you get the five minutes? Do you
think the spammers actually care that someone calls it spam?

Naive.

Thank you.

DDW

 

[mikeyhsd]

it's a matter of low IQ trying to prove to others it is intelligent.

thinking that the correct spelling of SPAM will do it.

(e-mail address removed)

Unfortunately no!

Well, if they're using a newsreader, changing the subject to "Spam"
ain't gonna do anything to help that. The offending post is off
somewhere else, not to be seen.

Changing the subject and posting something about the unquoted poster
does absolutely nothing. At least quote the email address of the
offender, huh???

Another orphan (subject changed) post.

Don'tcha think most people know "spam" when they see it?

DDW

DDW

 

[Bill in Co.]

Oh for cryin' out loud. How many spammers do you think actually come back
and see their spam message?
Zero.

Where do you get the five minutes? Do you
think the spammers actually care that someone calls it spam?

Nope.

 

[mikeyhsd]

in fact labeling it as SPAM will cause MORE people to check it out just to see.


(e-mail address removed)

Oh for cryin' out loud. How many spammers do you think actually come back
and see their spam message?
Zero.

Where do you get the five minutes? Do you
think the spammers actually care that someone calls it spam?

Nope.

 

[Tom [Pepper] Willett]

People who feel compelled to label it as SPAM to assist the rest of us less
fortunates, have too much non-productive time on their hands.

in fact labeling it as SPAM will cause MORE people to check it out just to
see.


(e-mail address removed)

Oh for cryin' out loud. How many spammers do you think actually come back
and see their spam message?
Zero.

Where do you get the five minutes? Do you
think the spammers actually care that someone calls it spam?

Nope.

 

[Pegasus \(MVP\)]

People who feel compelled to label it as SPAM to assist the rest of us
less
fortunates, have too much non-productive time on their hands.

To substantiate the term "non-productive time", please type the following
strings into a Google search box:

"Tom [Pepper] Willett" 2008
and
"pegasus (MVP)" 2008

Now let's stop this silly bickering.

 

[Unknown]

Replies in line

: it unattractive to potential readers. Most spammers give up quickly when
: they see their spam message defaced within five minutes of posting.

Oh for cryin' out loud. How many spammers do you think actually come back
and see their spam message?

Do you know? Any statistics?
Where do you get the five minutes? Do you

think the spammers actually care that someone calls it spam?

Absolutely. Particularly those try to sell something such as a registry
cleaner or virus program.

 

[Unknown]

Cheeeeeese---You got two out of two incorrect. Think man, think.

 

[Unknown]

Back that up with statistics. I.E. Verify that.
in fact labeling it as SPAM will cause MORE people to check it out just to see.


(e-mail address removed)

Oh for cryin' out loud. How many spammers do you think actually come back
and see their spam message?
Zero.

Where do you get the five minutes? Do you
think the spammers actually care that someone calls it spam?

Nope.

 

[Unknown]

You in effect, are insulting many valuable posters (problem solvers) in this
group. Shame on you.

People who feel compelled to label it as SPAM to assist the rest of us
less
fortunates, have too much non-productive time on their hands.

in fact labeling it as SPAM will cause MORE people to check it out just to
see.


(e-mail address removed)

Oh for cryin' out loud. How many spammers do you think actually come back
and see their spam message?
Zero.

Where do you get the five minutes? Do you
think the spammers actually care that someone calls it spam?

Nope.

 

[Unknown]

Think very carefully! Doesn't your posted statement come from someone with a low IQ?
it's a matter of low IQ trying to prove to others it is intelligent.

thinking that the correct spelling of SPAM will do it.

(e-mail address removed)

Unfortunately no!

Well, if they're using a newsreader, changing the subject to "Spam"
ain't gonna do anything to help that. The offending post is off
somewhere else, not to be seen.

Changing the subject and posting something about the unquoted poster
does absolutely nothing. At least quote the email address of the
offender, huh???

Another orphan (subject changed) post.

Don'tcha think most people know "spam" when they see it?

DDW

DDW

 

[Tom [Pepper] Willett]

They need to continue solving problems and stop acting like they are
providing a valuable service by informing us of spam.

: You in effect, are insulting many valuable posters (problem solvers) in
this
: group. Shame on you.
: : > People who feel compelled to label it as SPAM to assist the rest of us
: > less
: > fortunates, have too much non-productive time on their hands.
: >
: > : > in fact labeling it as SPAM will cause MORE people to check it out just
to
: > see.
: >
: >
: > (e-mail address removed)
: >
: >
: >
: > : > Tom [Pepper] Willett wrote:
: > >> it unattractive to potential readers. Most spammers give up quickly
: > when
: > >> they see their spam message defaced within five minutes of posting.
: > >
: > > Oh for cryin' out loud. How many spammers do you think actually come
: > back
: > > and see their spam message?
: >
: > Zero.
: >
: > > Where do you get the five minutes? Do you
: > > think the spammers actually care that someone calls it spam?
: >
: > Nope.
: >
: >
: >
:
:

 

[Tom [Pepper] Willett]

You continue doing what you do so well....trolling.

Think very carefully! Doesn't your posted statement come from someone with a
low IQ?
it's a matter of low IQ trying to prove to others it is intelligent.

thinking that the correct spelling of SPAM will do it.

(e-mail address removed)

Unfortunately no!

Well, if they're using a newsreader, changing the subject to "Spam"
ain't gonna do anything to help that. The offending post is off
somewhere else, not to be seen.

Changing the subject and posting something about the unquoted poster
does absolutely nothing. At least quote the email address of the
offender, huh???

Another orphan (subject changed) post.

Don'tcha think most people know "spam" when they see it?

DDW

DDW