A Armin Zingler Jan 16, 2006 #21 Herfried K. Wagner said: Could you describe a scenario where the code above would semantically make sense? Click to expand... This is not the answer to my question. ;-) At the same places where it makes sense with classes. Armin
Herfried K. Wagner said: Could you describe a scenario where the code above would semantically make sense? Click to expand... This is not the answer to my question. ;-) At the same places where it makes sense with classes. Armin
H Homer J Simpson Jan 16, 2006 #22 This is not the answer to my question. ;-) At the same places where it makes sense with classes. Click to expand... In the dark days, you could do this 10 DIM I(17) 20 FOR I = 1 TO 17 30 READ I(I) 40 NEXT I 10000 DATA 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 1026, 1027, 1028 .... but not these days!
This is not the answer to my question. ;-) At the same places where it makes sense with classes. Click to expand... In the dark days, you could do this 10 DIM I(17) 20 FOR I = 1 TO 17 30 READ I(I) 40 NEXT I 10000 DATA 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 1026, 1027, 1028 .... but not these days!
A Armin Zingler Jan 16, 2006 #23 Homer J Simpson said: In the dark days, you could do this 10 DIM I(17) 20 FOR I = 1 TO 17 30 READ I(I) 40 NEXT I 10000 DATA 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 1026, 1027, 1028 ... but not these days! Click to expand... Still possible on my CPC emulator. ;-) Armin
Homer J Simpson said: In the dark days, you could do this 10 DIM I(17) 20 FOR I = 1 TO 17 30 READ I(I) 40 NEXT I 10000 DATA 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 1026, 1027, 1028 ... but not these days! Click to expand... Still possible on my CPC emulator. ;-) Armin
