"The dreaded lookup field"

K

Ken Snell \(MVP\)

A misunderstanding, I think. Combo boxes are very good and useful and are
not to be banned. Plus they greatly facilitate the elimination of people
entering bad data.

The "lookup" field issue relates to the property that you can set for a
field in the table itself. Don't do that! Leads to problem when you look at
data that it appears to be the lookup value but instead is the real value;
people forget that and wonder why their queries don't work when they try to
find records where that field's value is the looked-up value and not the
real value.
 
S

Sue

Thanks for clarifying.


Ken Snell (MVP) said:
A misunderstanding, I think. Combo boxes are very good and useful and are
not to be banned. Plus they greatly facilitate the elimination of people
entering bad data.

The "lookup" field issue relates to the property that you can set for a
field in the table itself. Don't do that! Leads to problem when you look
at data that it appears to be the lookup value but instead is the real
value; people forget that and wonder why their queries don't work when
they try to find records where that field's value is the looked-up value
and not the real value.
 
J

John W. Vinson

A misunderstanding, I think. Combo boxes are very good and useful and are
not to be banned. Plus they greatly facilitate the elimination of people
entering bad data.

Well... they don't eliminate the *people*. You have to call the HR department
(or Cousin Luigi) to do that!

<g, d & r>

John W. Vinson [MVP]
 
K

Ken Snell \(MVP\)

John W. Vinson said:
Well... they don't eliminate the *people*. You have to call the HR
department
(or Cousin Luigi) to do that!

Yep, you're right... a bit of "wishful thinking" crept into my reply.....
 
T

tina

hmm, do you think MS might add that option to the next version of Access?
i'd buy it in a heartbeat! <bg>
 
K

Ken Snell \(MVP\)

tina said:
hmm, do you think MS might add that option to the next version of Access?
i'd buy it in a heartbeat! <bg>

I don't think it's on the "top 100" list right now..... < s >
 
J

Jeff Conrad [MSFT]

in message:
hmm, do you think MS might add that option to the next version of Access?
i'd buy it in a heartbeat! <bg>

It's in the specs at the moment.....



I'm kidding, just kidding!!
:)

--
Jeff Conrad - Access Junkie - MVP Alumni
Software Development Engineer in Test
XAS Services
Microsoft Corporation

Co-author - Microsoft Office Access 2007 Inside Out
Presenter - Microsoft Access 2007 Essentials
http://www.accessmvp.com/JConrad/accessjunkie.html
Access 2007 Info: http://www.AccessJunkie.com
 
J

John W. Vinson

I don't think it's on the "top 100" list right now..... < s >

I think it's been on request since before there was a Microsoft... remember
the XOI instruction? Execute Operator Immediate...

John W. Vinson [MVP]
 
T

Tom Lake

tina said:
hmm, do you think MS might add that option to the next version of Access?
i'd buy it in a heartbeat! <bg>

They had it in Alpha testing but it eliminated the entire team that was
doing the testing.
Now it's tough for MS to find people willing to work on it any further.

Tom Lake
 
T

tina

ROFL!!

Tom Lake said:
They had it in Alpha testing but it eliminated the entire team that was
doing the testing.
Now it's tough for MS to find people willing to work on it any further.

Tom Lake
 
A

Aaron Kempf

I DISAGREE!

Lookup fields ROCK

if you want to get plain text then you should use Query Analyzer or SQL
Server Management Studio

ADP uber alles
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads


Top