temp monitoring diodes

[Vic Smith]

Untrue, "IF" there's a discrete second sensor, it may show
up nearer the heat sources on one board, further away on
others. Somewhat arbitrary and anything BUT a deliberate
attemp to keep away from these sources.

It's all beside the point though, most boards don't have
discrete temp sensors, instead relying on a readout provided
from one of the chips instead.




Wrong.
Northbridge can easily get hotter than a CPU using HALT
cooling, particularly the newer generations of flipchip,
chipsets and any of the more efficient CPUs (mainly meaning,
not a Prescott).

You are right.
Below are Everest reports taken while system is "idle" (5 windows, but
no HD activity, and CPU only engaged in XP background activity.
The CPU is a Northwood with the stock Intel Fan/HS.
Asus Probe software consistently shows the same trend, but
the MB/CPU temps are 32/28.



Everest Report (Summary)
Motherboard:
CPU Type Intel Pentium 4, 3200 MHz (16 x 200)
Motherboard Name Asus P4P800 SE (5 PCI, 1 AGP, 1 WiFi,
4 DDR DIMM, Audio, Gigabit LAN)
Motherboard Chipset Intel Springdale i865PE
System Memory 2048 MB (DDR

Everest Report (Sensor)
Temperatures:
Motherboard 32 °C (90 °F)
CPU 27 °C (81 °F)
GPU 54 °C (129 °F)
GPU Ambient 37 °C (99 °F)
Maxtor 7Y250P0 27 °C (81 °F)
Maxtor 6B250R0 30 °C (86 °F)
Maxtor 6Y160P0 26 °C (79 °F)

Cooling Fans:
CPU 3041 RPM
Chassis 1513 RPM
Power Supply 2538 RPM

 

[meow2222]

(e-mail address removed) wrote

Nothing to 'accept', child.

how did I guess

NT

 

[meow2222]

... snip ...

Nothing but invective. I tried letting you out of the PLONKbox,
but that was obviously a mistake. Back you go.

Idiotic invective too. Its odd cos he does often get the simpler things
right, but loses it entirely on stuff like this.


NT

 

[meow2222]

(e-mail address removed) wrote

Nope, not unless he is using a peltier for cpu cooling, child.

aha, well done for admitting it is in fact possible, and thus not
against the laws of physics.

A quick hand check isnt likely to be able
to distinguish between 30C and 40C, child.

it isnt intended to. Do you follow anything? Its intended to make sure
the parts arent over 60C, which is what matters. Whether a cpu is at 30
or 40 is immaterial.

Makes a lot more sense to make the cpu work
harder and see which temp increases instead, child.

not really.

No need for that when both of those temps are fine, child.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

lol. I spose thats all thats left.

Perfectly reasonable to rely on it with both temps being fine for the cpu
temp, and completely trivial to check if they are reversed or not, child.

Even someone as stupid as you should be able to manage that, if someone
was actually stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane,
given that you have clearly wanked yourself blind years ago, child.

I'd really hate to be you, so utterly strung up by your own ego issues.


NT

 

[meow2222]

I understand fine that you are desperately attempting to bullshit your
way out of your predicament and fooling absolutely no one at all, child.

There must be a name for this. Anyone?


NT

 

[meow2222]

Rod: When you are in a hole, the only way out is to stop digging, child.

NT: Don't fight with a pig in the mud; you get dirty and the pig enjoys it.

Seriously guys...

Lol, youre probably right.


NT

 

[Rod Speed]

how did I guess

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

 

[Oscar Jones]

Some terminal ****wit plonker that's so stupid
that it hasnt even noticed that kill files actually
work without announcing their contents,
just the puerile shit thats all it can ever manage.

 

[Rod Speed]

(e-mail address removed) wrote

Rod Speed wrote

aha, well done for admitting it is in fact possible,
and thus not against the laws of physics.

Pity that he aint using a peltier, ****wit.

Its against the laws of physics given that he aint using a peltier, ****wit.

it isnt intended to. Do you follow anything? Its intended to
make sure the parts arent over 60C, which is what matters.

It aint gunna be over 60 even if the sensors are reversed, ****wit.

Whether a cpu is at 30 or 40 is immaterial.

Irrelevant to the OP's question, ****wit.

not really.

Fraid so. Thats what the OP wants to
know, if the sensors are reversed or not.

You're so stupid you cant even manage to work that out yet.

lol. I spose thats all thats left.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

I'd really hate to be you, so utterly strung up by your own ego issues.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

 

[Rod Speed]

Some gutless ****wit desperately cowering behind
(e-mail address removed) wrote just the puerile shit
thats always pouring from the back of it.

 

[kony]

For you clowns, yes.

Cool, Rod has now added "clowns" to his vocabulary.

Can we be child clowns bullshitting our way out of paper
bags? Please Rod?

 

[kony]

Maybe you could explain how this works then. CPUs need to be run at
relatively low temps to preserve high speed performance, whereas volt
regs and so on can happily run upto 175C.

Not really true, you'll get abysmal life out of a regulator
up at 175C. Likewise you shouldn't run a CPU at their max
spec'd ~ 75-90C either.

Cost is important in the
competitive world of computer parts, and lower design temps mean more
silicon and more heatsinking. So why would I, or anyone else designing
a mobo, use a volt reg design temp limit below that of the CPU? In what
way did I go wrong all these years when designing psus?

You asking to go off-topic. Better to post in a different
forum.

You'd use a volt reg design that stays cooler because there
is limited board real-estate to 'sink away the heat, and
because immediately adjacent copper, coating, nearby
capacitors, inevitably 'sink some of that heat but don't
have the high temp resistance of silicon.

 

[kony]

There must be a name for this. Anyone?

Fecal fixation?

 

[Rod Speed]

Some gutless ****wit desperately cowering behind
it can ever manage when its got done like a dinner, as always.

 

[paulmd]

Fecal fixation?

Tourettes?

 

[paulmd]

Fecal fixation?

Tourettes?

 

[xModem]

Fecal fixation?

Christ complex?

 

[xModem]

Some terminal ****wit plonker that's so stupid
that it hasnt even noticed that kill files actually
work without announcing their contents,
just the puerile shit thats all it can ever manage.

Some gutless, illiterate ****wit desperately cowering behind
(e-mail address removed) wrote just the puerile shit
thats (sic) always pouring from the back of it,
and who just can't stand not having the last word.

 

[meow2222]

On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:30:09 +1000, "Rod Speed"

Cool, Rod has now added "clowns" to his vocabulary.

Can we be child clowns bullshitting our way out of paper
bags? Please Rod?

hehe You only need ask.

 

[meow2222]

Fecal fixation?

perhaps. I was just wondering if there was more to it than plain
denial.

NT