Suzanne S. Barnhill wyskroba³(a):
Then you would apply outline numbering to the TOC styles just as you
would to any other, following the instructions at
http://www.shaunakelly.com/word/numbering/OutlineNumbering.html. But
if your headings are numbered in the document, the TOC should pick up
the numbering.
Headings are not numbered. At least Word does not assume that they are - see
my first post. Numbering uses another style than heading's name.
OK, I'll try to explain my problem using different words.
My headings, which I want to put into the TOC, look like that:
1.
Chapter
1.1.
Chapter
1.2.
Chapter
1.2.1.
Chapter
1.2.2.
Chapter
1.3.
Chapter
etc.
Each level (1., 1.x., 1.x.x., etc.) uses a different style both in the
document body as well as in the TOC and both for the numbering and chapter's
name.
Putting chapters' names <Chapter> into the TOC was no problem. The problem
was letting Word assing proper numbering to each of the chapters.
What I achieved so far is that chapters in the TOC are numbered. However
it's been done partly manually. I'll describe you why.
I managed to automatically number the first level (1., 2., etc.). If I put
something between Chapter 1 and 2 in the document body and mark it using a
proper style, Chapter 2 becomes Chapter 3 - that's understood and OK.
But now the second level (1.1., 1.2., 1.3. etc.). It also goes automatically
if I put something between e.g. 1.2. and 1.3. If I put someting before
Chapter 1, the "old" Chapter 1 becomes 2 - OK. But the second level does not
change its primary digit. As a result I get something like that (comparing
to the situation depicted above):
1.
Chapter
2.
Chapter
1.1.
Chapter
1.2.
Chapter
etc.
The same happens with the third level (1.2.1., 1.2.2. etc.) and so on.
In other words, when I try to set up numbering format (TOC Edit | Modify |
TOC 2 | Modify | Format | Numbering | Define new numbering format --> as for
Word 2007) only the last digit is greyed out which means that it is set
automatically. Previous digit or two previous digits are fixed by me. That's
why I can get 1.2.x numbering instead if x.x.x., where two first digits are
set in accordance with numbering of levels above.
Hope this will help you to understand my problem. Thank you for your
patience.