G Guest Sep 8, 2007 #1 Any ideas on why a subform that populates correctly in 2000 and 2007 will not populate in 2003 ? Thanks.
Any ideas on why a subform that populates correctly in 2000 and 2007 will not populate in 2003 ? Thanks.
J John W. Vinson Sep 9, 2007 #2 Any ideas on why a subform that populates correctly in 2000 and 2007 will not populate in 2003 ? Thanks. Click to expand... Not without knowing a lot more. Care to post the SQL view of the subform's recordsource? The nature of the "incorrectness"? Does the query itself return incorrect data? John W. Vinson [MVP]
Any ideas on why a subform that populates correctly in 2000 and 2007 will not populate in 2003 ? Thanks. Click to expand... Not without knowing a lot more. Care to post the SQL view of the subform's recordsource? The nature of the "incorrectness"? Does the query itself return incorrect data? John W. Vinson [MVP]
L Linq Adams via AccessMonster.com Sep 9, 2007 #3 And are these occurrances on the same machine running different versions of Access or on different machines? Not without knowing a lot more. Care to post the SQL view of the subform's recordsource? The nature of the "incorrectness"? Does the query itself return incorrect data? John W. Vinson [MVP] Click to expand... -- There's ALWAYS more than one way to skin a cat! Answers/posts based on Access 2000 Message posted via AccessMonster.com
And are these occurrances on the same machine running different versions of Access or on different machines? Not without knowing a lot more. Care to post the SQL view of the subform's recordsource? The nature of the "incorrectness"? Does the query itself return incorrect data? John W. Vinson [MVP] Click to expand... -- There's ALWAYS more than one way to skin a cat! Answers/posts based on Access 2000 Message posted via AccessMonster.com
G Guest Sep 9, 2007 #4 Thank you. Travelling for three days...not in a position to post the SQL until I return. Will do so soonest. Thanks again.
Thank you. Travelling for three days...not in a position to post the SQL until I return. Will do so soonest. Thanks again.
G Guest Sep 9, 2007 #5 Different machines. I am looking at the possibility that the 2003 installation is the problem, not 2003 itself. Thank you.
Different machines. I am looking at the possibility that the 2003 installation is the problem, not 2003 itself. Thank you.
G Guest Sep 17, 2007 #6 The solution was simply to install MS Office SP2...then the subform worked fine. Very interesting. Thanks.
The solution was simply to install MS Office SP2...then the subform worked fine. Very interesting. Thanks.
G Guest Sep 17, 2007 #7 The solution was simply to install MS Office SP2...then the subform worked fine. Very interesting. Thanks.
The solution was simply to install MS Office SP2...then the subform worked fine. Very interesting. Thanks.
