Spyware Finders

[Buffalo]

AdAware and SpyBot don't fare real well in this comparison.
Anyone have any personal experience with the top rated product ,
Aluria's Spyware Eliminator.
I use SpyBot, AdAware, and SpywareBlaster (all are free) and am
satisified.
Any opinions.
Thanks.

http://www.adwarereport.com/mt/archives/000004.html

 

[andy smart]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Buffalo wrote:

| AdAware and SpyBot don't fare real well in this comparison.
| Anyone have any personal experience with the top rated product ,
| Aluria's Spyware Eliminator.
| I use SpyBot, AdAware, and SpywareBlaster (all are free) and am
| satisified.
| Any opinions.
| Thanks.
|
| http://www.adwarereport.com/mt/archives/000004.html
|
|
I use adaware and spybot too, and they seem to do a good job. But then
again proving security is trying to prove a negative: how do you prove
that no syware has got past your scanners when your scanners are all you
have on which to depend?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBOCP4qmlxlf41jHgRAvpIAKDelXaQ8JXgFwCI+BDNTKLoN2MhAwCgt0dW
1aDR4ElhoaYJLIGrltqmzTs=
=VwdR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[Buffalo]

"andy smart"

I use adaware and spybot too, and they seem to do a good job. But then
again proving security is trying to prove a negative: how do you prove
that no syware has got past your scanners when your scanners are all you
have on which to depend?

I found the following report on Aluria's Spyware Eliminator from PC
World. Not rated well there. Amazing, who can you believe.
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,115939,pg,7,00.asp
Thanks for the reply.