F
Frank Dreyfus
Hi,
My home LAN has two XP machines. Both run well and experience good
transfer rates when dl'ing from the internet.
But file copies from one PC to the other are extremely slow!
Using Windows Explorer, and watching the Networking graph in
Taskmanager, I'm lucky to get up to 1% network utilization. Both nics
are 10/100 full duplex. So 1% utilization equates to around 1 mbps.
But if I use the PCAnywhere file transfer feature (which apparently
does not use Explorer), I get 15 to 30% utilization and sometimes peaks
as high as 50%.
Why is there such a large disparity in transfer rates between these two
methods?
I don't think it would be due to nic settings since transfer rates are
good except in the situation described.
I have watched this frequently and my observations are rather
consistent.
Thanks for your ideas,
Frank
My home LAN has two XP machines. Both run well and experience good
transfer rates when dl'ing from the internet.
But file copies from one PC to the other are extremely slow!
Using Windows Explorer, and watching the Networking graph in
Taskmanager, I'm lucky to get up to 1% network utilization. Both nics
are 10/100 full duplex. So 1% utilization equates to around 1 mbps.
But if I use the PCAnywhere file transfer feature (which apparently
does not use Explorer), I get 15 to 30% utilization and sometimes peaks
as high as 50%.
Why is there such a large disparity in transfer rates between these two
methods?
I don't think it would be due to nic settings since transfer rates are
good except in the situation described.
I have watched this frequently and my observations are rather
consistent.
Thanks for your ideas,
Frank