In my experience the load times in Reports are over-estimates, and the load
times shown when editing pages are under-estimates. The true figure (for my
pages) is in between, but nearer the "edit view" estimate. (For one of my
pages: Reports 23 secs., Edit View 5 secs., Actual [downloaded and
rendered] 12 secs. The page is 15KB, 8 images, plus external JavaScript and
CSS).
Since you are using the same images (.gif and .jpg) in all pages, the first
page will take longer to load than the rest - the images will be loaded from
the browser's cache (except for VML graphics, which are embedded in the
page.)
You may want to consider removing the auto-shape: this uses VML graphics
which are only visible in IE5.0 and later, and may be adding a lot to the
rendering time for that page.
Ron
--
Reply only to group - emails will be deleted unread.
DaveNYC said:
My pages are all around 20-25kb in size and 'reports' is telling me that
they're taking up to 90 seconds to load for 56k moden.. I use one gif for
the banner which has been optimized and my nav buttons really aren't that
big a deal. No flash, no music, no jpg's. I've tried re-sizing my gif
banner to 75 ppi and it reduces to postage stamp size. I don't get it, I
have one page that has an auto shape rectangle on it - that's it - and the
program is telling me that I'm 9 seconds over 56k. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks. Also, I'm using the exact same graphics on every page, will this
make a difference?