D
David
98 Lite recommends using the W95 First Edition shell to save onFirefox just barely works on (my) old 100Mz pentium, 64megs ram,
windows 95 (which some think is more stable than 98) system.
I wonder how much more can be squeezed out of an old system,
by using a more efficient shell, than explorer? I have never
tried the popular, litestep, for instance, but alternative
shells are often billed as using substantially less windows
resources (distinct from memory per se).
resources. Anything that does not include IE has got to be more
efficient.
I haven't tried FireFox but I have been using the Mozilla suite since
its inception. I have never had any problems provided IE was not on
the machine eating up resources.