B
Besus
i have a dual monitor setup, and use a lot of icons to start prog's or as
web shortcuts.
my xp often bogs down and the desktop icons take forever to "blink" on,
almost one-by-one, bonk, bonk, bonk.
seems funny, on a 3.2 gig processor w 2 gig of ram, and a supposedly robust
OS, that it would take, like 30 seconds for my desktop icons to materialize
(about 200 of them).
is windows-95 really faster, or just my imagination?
i mean, really, why would it go "bonk-bonk-bonk" when it could simply take a
snapshot of the whole arrangement and uh, keep x and y coordinates in a
relatively tiny fragment of ram somewhere. or is bloatware always bloatware
and there's no way out except Linux?
JeBus
web shortcuts.
my xp often bogs down and the desktop icons take forever to "blink" on,
almost one-by-one, bonk, bonk, bonk.
seems funny, on a 3.2 gig processor w 2 gig of ram, and a supposedly robust
OS, that it would take, like 30 seconds for my desktop icons to materialize
(about 200 of them).
is windows-95 really faster, or just my imagination?
i mean, really, why would it go "bonk-bonk-bonk" when it could simply take a
snapshot of the whole arrangement and uh, keep x and y coordinates in a
relatively tiny fragment of ram somewhere. or is bloatware always bloatware
and there's no way out except Linux?
JeBus