Using only what has been posted, lightning could have been
incoming on AC electric. Lightning seeking earth via four
homes. One good path on incoming AC electric is into
computer, through integrated NIC, out via cable and router, to
cable earth ground. TV cable boxes and computer DRAM both
were not damaged for the same reason. Both did not provide an
incoming and outgoing path through electronics; therefore no
damage.
SAme has been observed elsewhere. For example, at another
location, a VCR and TV, side by side, and connected to AC
electric and cable. Incoming on AC electric. But only one
was damaged. The appliance that made a superior path to earth
ground via cable performed as a very expensive and
unintentional surge protector. The other appliance with
better internal protection was not damaged.
There is no stopping, blocking, or absorbing surges as a
plug-in UPS hopes you have assumed. Franklin demonstrated in
1752 that protection is about shunting (connecting, diverting)
a transient to earth; before it can find a destructive path
through transistors. Typical UPS connects a computer directly
to AC mains when not in battery backup mode. So where is
protection? Protection is based on assumptions rather than
facts.
A UPS relay that switches to battery backup AND the circuit
breaker require tens of milliseconds to react. Surges destroy
electronics and terminate in microseconds - 1000 times
faster. Neither a relay nor circuit breaker - both too slow
- even claim to provide such protection. But they hope you
will assume. The UPS claims protection from a transient that
does not typically exist; citing a vague and subjective:
"surge protection". Meanwhile, it does not protect from
transients that typically damage electronics. It's called
lying by telling half truths; hoping you will make
assumptions; assume the UPS provides effective protection.
The UPS does not even claim such protection - while
connecting computer directly to AC mains.
Meanwhile, show me otherwise. Show me the manufacturer spec
that defines protection from each type of transient. Notice
those specs assume all transients are the same type. More
assumptions to promote protection that is not effective.
How does a surge protector work? Picture is a power strip
protector (that uses same circuit also found in plug-in
UPSes). Active components - MOVS - are removed. The light
still says the protector is OK:
http://www.zerosurge.com/HTML/movs.html
Even with MOVs removed, power strip still provides
electricity to appliance receptacles. The protection circuit
is not between appliance and AC mains as they hope you will
assume. Like a UPS, the power strip does not sit,
electrically, between AC mains and the computer. But they
hope you will make such assumptions. They hope you ignore the
most critical component in a protection system - earth ground.
Some manufacturers hope you keep making assumptions. Their
products are promoted by those who don't even know what a
surge protector does - myth purveyors. However, responsible
electrical manufacturers sell effective protectors.
Intermatic, GE, and Cutler-Hammer were cited from Home Depot
and Lowes. Other manufacturers are Square D, Leviton,
Polyphaser, and Siemens. Effective protectors with a
reputable name AND that provides a connection to single point
earth. A connection that should be 'less than 10 feet'.
In multiple paragraph are reasons why that UPS is not
effective protection. Its function is to protect data from
blackouts and extreme brownouts; not surge protection. Why
some things are damaged whereas others are not was also
explained. Lightning is not capricious. But many (including
gas line repairmen) sometimes forget even what was taught in
elementary school science about lightning. Lightning damages
some things and does not pass through other things for
specific reasons.
Four houses suffered damage when lightning made a direct
connection through household appliances to earth. Damage from
direct strikes. Homeowners avoid such damage by diverting a
transient to earth before it can enter the building.
Solutions can be obtained in Home Depot, Lowes, and most
electrical supply houses. Never saw an effective protector in
Sears, Kmart, Radio Shack, Staples, Walmart, Circuit City,
CompUSA, or Best Buys. Ineffective protectors are easily
identified: 1) No dedicated connection to earth ground and 2)
manufacturer avoids all discussion about earthing.
To understand what was damaged, to predict possibly
overstressed components, and to avoid future damage; find
paths both incoming and outgoing to earth. Avoid future
damage why earthing those incoming paths at the service
entrance. Again, even Ben Franklin demonstrated the concept
in 1752.