F
Fabio De Robertis
Hi again,
I noticed the SP2 installation on WinXP SP1 consumed 1.7Gb of free
space on my hard drive. It's frankly excessive! If you have less than
1.7Gb of free space the update fails. I have System Restore switched
off.
Moreover we have a spare WinXP SP1 installation (that we use very
often to test software) on a 2.1Gb partition with 700Mb of free space
and so it's impossible to install SP2 there.
I think Microsoft should let the user choose a "work" or "temp"
directory (even on another partition or another hard drive) where to
download the Service Pack, backup the previous configuration and do
all the work necessary before copying the new files to the unit where
WinXP is (typically C: ). Why obliging to handle the whole update work
in the root partition?
Thanks for the explanation.
Fabio
I noticed the SP2 installation on WinXP SP1 consumed 1.7Gb of free
space on my hard drive. It's frankly excessive! If you have less than
1.7Gb of free space the update fails. I have System Restore switched
off.
Moreover we have a spare WinXP SP1 installation (that we use very
often to test software) on a 2.1Gb partition with 700Mb of free space
and so it's impossible to install SP2 there.
I think Microsoft should let the user choose a "work" or "temp"
directory (even on another partition or another hard drive) where to
download the Service Pack, backup the previous configuration and do
all the work necessary before copying the new files to the unit where
WinXP is (typically C: ). Why obliging to handle the whole update work
in the root partition?
Thanks for the explanation.
Fabio