Removing Event Handlers Question - Rephrased

[Charles Law]

I think I asked the wrong question last time, so I am starting a separate
post to distinguish them.

Take five classes: ClassA and ClassW...Z

ClassA raises five events: Event1...5

ClassW...Z handle some combination of these events. For example

ClassW handles Event1, 2 and 5
ClassX handles Event1, 3 and 4
ClassY handles Event2 and 4
...

At some point, I want to detach ClassX from ClassA, so if I were to write
the code longhand, I would have

RemoveHandler ClassA.Event1, AddressOf ClassX.Event1Handler
RemoveHandler ClassA.Event3, AddressOf ClassX.Event3Handler
RemoveHandler ClassA.Event4, AddressOf ClassX.Event4Handler

This is not so bad for a small number of classes and events, but I actually
have about 30 classes and 50 events. The combinations are too large to
contemplate the longhand approach.

..NET must keep track of what event is linked to what handler somewhere so
that it knows what to call. I am looking for a generic (iterative?) way to
detach handlers from events, given only the source class and target class.
These classes implement interfaces that contain the events and handlers if
that helps.

Can anyone give me any clues?

TIA

Charles

 

[yEaH rIgHt]

If you declare your classes using the WithEvents keyword, you can then
remove the all of the handlers by setting the class to nothing.

Example: Dim WithEvents cl as New ClassW

cl = Nothing

 

[yEaH rIgHt]

Take a look at this, it might help.

http://www.vbinfozine.com/t_bindevt.shtml

 

[Charles Law]

Hi

Thanks for the suggestion. I have just tried it though and get the same
result: after disposing the control and setting it to nothing, I can raise
event and the handler still handles it.

Charles

 

[Charles Law]

That is absolutely, 100%, spot on, what I was after.

Cheers.

Charles

 

[Charles Law]

Well, almost 100% ...

It's tantalisingly close, but there is still one slight gap.

The article shows how to find methods on a receiver that match the pattern
OnXXXX given the sender. It loops through the sender events and tries to get
methods from the receiver that match the pattern. For each one it finds it
either adds or removes a handler for the event.

This is great where there is a straight forward mapping, but I don't have a
straight forward mapping. For example, although I could easily use this
pattern in many cases, there are situations where the sender has two similar
events, only one of which a particular receiver is going to service.

Let's say that my sender has an event ValueChanged. My receiver could easily
have a method OnValueChanged that could be linked up using the technique
above. As it happens, my receiver has a method MyControl_ValueChanged, but
this also works with the technique above.

The problem arises where my sender has two values that can change. In this
case it can raise two events: Value1Changed and Value2Changed. My receiver
only services one of these, and which one is determined at runtime.
Therefore, the receiver still has a method MyControl_ValueChanged, because
it knows nothing of a sender that has two values.

This breaks the pattern, as there is now easy way to transform the event
Value2Changed into the method name MyControl_ValueChanged.

So, ...

I am trying to find a way of looping through the sender's events, as before,
but for each one I want to get the invocation list, and see if my receiver
is in it. Only if it is do I want to remove the handler. I have got this far

<code>
Public Shared Sub RemoveHandlers(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal receiver
As Object)

Dim SenderType As Type
Dim ReceiverType As Type

Dim dlgts() As [Delegate]

SenderType = sender.GetType()
ReceiverType = receiver.GetType()

For Each ei As EventInfo In SenderType.GetEvents()

' For each event that the sender can raise, get the invocation
list
dlgts = sender.Events.Item( *WHAT GOES
HERE?* ).GetInvocationList()

For Each dlgt As [Delegate] In dlgts
If *TEST FOR DELEGATE BEING ON RECEIVER?* Then
ei.RemoveEventHandler(sender, dlgt)
End If
Next dlgt

Next ei

End Sub
</code>

Can you suggest what might replace the capitalised text? Alternatively, can
you think of another wau of achieving the same end?

Thanks.

Charles
[If I can crack this then I will have only two problems remaining, one of
which is a totally random crash, that can occur at any time, at any place,
and cause immediate termination without going through any exception
handlers. I am using the Infragistics UltraWinToolbars, et al]