O
Olivier Marquet
Can someone tell me whether I should use NTFS, FAT or FAT32 when formatting
my Readyboost USB drive?
Thanks in advance.
my Readyboost USB drive?
Thanks in advance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Olivier Marquet said:Can someone tell me whether I should use NTFS, FAT or FAT32 when
formatting my Readyboost USB drive?
FAT32. I disagree with those who said NTFS. I read somewhere that FAT32
requires less disk reads and writes than NTFS, meaning that your flash
drive will last longer.
Gazwad said:Ken Gardner <[email protected]>, the wobbly-vagrant and jazzy
hip-hitter who likes merciless zipper surfing with moray eels, and
whose
partner is a cab-moll with a nauseating hey nonny nonny, wrote in
LOL
NTFS
Saws are too hard to use.--------------- ---- --- -- - - - -
Michal Kawecki said:
Ken Gardner said:Michal Kawecki said:[...]FAT32. I disagree with those who said NTFS. I read somewhere that
FAT32 requires less disk reads and writes than NTFS, meaning that
your flash drive will last longer.
http://www.uwe-sieber.de/usbstick_e.html
http://www2b.abc.net.au/science/techtalk/newposts/423/topic423591.shtm
I didn't find those specific sites, but I found others like it. But
doesn't Vista encrypt the contents of the ReadyBoost cache?
If so, isn't NTFS better suited for it despite the shorter shelf life?
[Note: not that I am going to change to NTFS solely for this reason --
the ability to encrypt the cache file alone is not enough reason for
me to switch the flash drive to NTFS.]
If a wear-levelling mechanism is poorly implemented then flash memory
will be quickly wear-out, because NTFS make write operations even when
you only read files. But I think in case of ReadyBoost pagefile it's not
very important; it's a single file only, and it's accessed by system
differently than normal files (by direct addressing 4 kB chunks).
Saws are too hard to use.--------------- ---- --- -- - - - -
Windows shell/user) said:I can't see how wear-levelling can work when the entire capacity of
the device is in use...
cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user) said:I can't see how wear-levelling can work when the entire capacity of
the device is in use...
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.