Re. deriving from eventArgs( )

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sujith Jagini
  • Start date Start date
S

Sujith Jagini

Hi,

When we create customEventArgs, we also derive the classes from
eventArgs( ) and I dont understand the advantage of this inheritance.
This is neither an interface nor applied as attribute.

I have seen similar stuff in remoting also where we derive from
marshallByRef object in SAO to create transparent proxy. I don't know
how it creates transparent just by inheriting from base class.

If you know the reason, please let me know.

Thank You

Sujith
 
* (e-mail address removed) (Sujith Jagini) scripsit:
When we create customEventArgs, we also derive the classes from
eventArgs( ) and I dont understand the advantage of this inheritance.
This is neither an interface nor applied as attribute.
Click to expand...

Mhm... In .NET, we use Pascal Case, 'EventArgs' instead of the crippled
'eventArgs'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

EventArgs( ) in customEventArgs( ) 1
EventArgs and derived classes 18
Challenge? [De-]Serialise a class derived from DataTable. 3
Prevent UserControl derivative from being designed 3
Multiple derivations from UserControl 7
EventArgs design question 3
When inheriting from System.Web.UI.Page or UserControl, do I have tocall their contructors? 4
Changing Interface or Inheritance base classes 2

Back
Top