Query showing name of field and value

G

Guest

I have a table with 100 fields. I do NOT have any option to modify the table.

Each of the fields has a numeric value.

I need a query that will result in a list of records, each one containing
the name of one of the fields in column 1 and the value of that field in
column 2, for all fields where the value in the field is > 0.

Query Results:
Column 1 Column 2
name of FieldA value of FieldA
name of FieldB value of FieldB
name of FieldD value of FieldD
 
J

John Vinson

I have a table with 100 fields. I do NOT have any option to modify the table.

Each of the fields has a numeric value.

I need a query that will result in a list of records, each one containing
the name of one of the fields in column 1 and the value of that field in
column 2, for all fields where the value in the field is > 0.

Query Results:
Column 1 Column 2
name of FieldA value of FieldA
name of FieldB value of FieldB
name of FieldD value of FieldD

Ow.

A monstrously large Normalizing UNION query would be your best bet:

SELECT "FieldA" AS Fieldname, [FieldA] AS FieldValue
FROM widetable
UNION ALL
SELECT "FieldB", [FieldB] FROM widetable
UNION ALL
SELECT "FieldC", [FieldC] FROM widetable
UNION ALL
.... etc. for 100 SELECTS.

This *may* run into the dreaded Query Too COmplex error but give it a
try.
 
G

Gary Walter

Bill Sturdevant said:
I have a table with 100 fields. I do NOT have any option to modify the table.

Each of the fields has a numeric value.

I need a query that will result in a list of records, each one containing
the name of one of the fields in column 1 and the value of that field in
column 2, for all fields where the value in the field is > 0.

Query Results:
Column 1 Column 2
name of FieldA value of FieldA
name of FieldB value of FieldB
name of FieldD value of FieldD

Hi Bill,

In addition to John's sage advice,
I might think about saving the data
to a thin table (even if the Union query
does not choke on "too complex", I imagine
using the query for any further processing
will affect performance).

So...one alternative might be to save the
following code in a new module:

'****** start of code **************
Option Explicit
Public Sub fImportToThinTable(pFromTable As Variant, pToTable As Variant)
On Error GoTo Err_fImportToThinTable
Dim rsFrom As DAO.Recordset
Dim rsTo As DAO.Recordset
Dim Response, strMsg As String, varReturn
Dim strSQL As String
Dim lngVal As Long
Dim lngRecNum As Long, i As Long

'check that pFromTable is not null nor ZLS
If Len(Trim(pFromTable & "")) > 0 Then
'check that pToTable is not null nor ZLS
If Len(Trim(pToTable & "")) > 0 Then
'continue processing
Else
MsgBox "Please provide name of wide table " _
& "with many number fields."
GoTo Exit_fImportToThinTable
End If
Else
MsgBox "Please provide name of thin table " _
& "you wish to fill with number data."
GoTo Exit_fImportToThinTable
End If

strMsg = "Will be importing number data from the following table:" _
& vbCrLf & vbCrLf & pFromTable & vbCrLf & vbCrLf _
& "into the following thin table:" _
& vbCrLf & vbCrLf & pToTable
Response = MsgBox(strMsg, vbOKCancel)
If Response = vbCancel Then ' User chose to Cancel
GoTo Exit_fImportToThinTable
End If

DoCmd.Hourglass True

'check if pToTable exists
If TableExists(CStr(pToTable)) Then
'if it exists, clear out all data
CurrentDb.Execute "DELETE * FROM " & pToTable, dbFailOnError
Else
'does not exist, so create it
strSQL = "CREATE TABLE " & pToTable & " (ID AUTOINCREMENT, " _
& "FldName TEXT, FldValue LONG, " _
& "CONSTRAINT PK_ID PRIMARY KEY (ID ));"
'Debug.Print strSQL
CurrentDb.Execute strSQL, dbFailOnError
End If

Set rsFrom = CurrentDb.OpenRecordset(pFromTable, dbOpenDynaset)
'quit if empty table
If rsFrom.EOF = True Then
rsFrom.Close
MsgBox pFromTable & " does not contain any records.", vbCritical
GoTo Exit_fImportToThinTable
Else
'continue
End If

Set rsTo = CurrentDb.OpenRecordset(pToTable, dbOpenDynaset)

rsFrom.MoveFirst
lngRecNum = 0
Do While Not rsFrom.EOF
lngRecNum = lngRecNum + 1

'****** update progress display in status bar *****************
varReturn = SysCmd(acSysCmdSetStatus, "Processing Rec # " & lngRecNum)

For i = 0 To rsFrom.Fields.Count - 1
'**** save only nonNull, positive values ****
'test rsFrom value
If rsFrom.Fields(i) > 0 Then
With rsTo
.AddNew
!FldName = rsFrom.Fields(i).Name
!FldValue = rsFrom.Fields(i)
.Update
End With
Else
'don't save null or negative values
End If
Next i

rsFrom.MoveNext
Loop

'clear display in status bar
varReturn = SysCmd(acSysCmdClearStatus)

rsFrom.Close
rsTo.Close

MsgBox "Have successfully imported number data from " & vbCrLf _
& pFromTable & vbCrLf & " into table " & pToTable & "."


Exit_fImportToThinTable:
DoCmd.Hourglass False
Set rsFrom = Nothing
Set rsTo = Nothing
Exit Sub

Err_fImportToThinTable:
MsgBox Err.Description
Resume Exit_fImportToThinTable
End Sub

Public Function TableExists(strTableName As String) As Boolean
'from Joe Fallon
On Error Resume Next
TableExists = IsObject(CurrentDb.TableDefs(strTableName))
End Function
'******** end of code *************

Save the module (giving it a new like "modImport").
Click on "Debug/Compile.." in top menu to make
sure didn't get some word-wrap problem in the
copy and paste.

To test this, I made the following simple table "tblManyFields"

f1 f2 f3 f4 f5
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20

In the Immediate Window, I then entered the following
and hit ENTER

fImportToThinTable "tblManyFields","tblThin"

and "tblThin" ended up with following values:

ID FldName FldValue
1 f1 1
2 f2 2
3 f3 3
4 f4 4
5 f5 5
6 f1 6
7 f2 7
8 f3 8
9 f4 9
10 f5 10
11 f1 11
12 f2 12
13 f3 13
14 f4 14
15 f5 15
16 f1 16
17 f2 17
18 f3 18
19 f4 19
20 f5 20

I think this is what you wanted.

Gary Walter
 
G

Gary Walter

Sorry... the sub's parameter check code
had reversed msgs...should be:

'check that pFromTable is not null nor ZLS
If Len(Trim(pFromTable & "")) > 0 Then
'check that pToTable is not null nor ZLS
If Len(Trim(pToTable & "")) > 0 Then
'continue processing
Else
MsgBox "Please provide name of thin table " _
& "you wish to fill with number data."
GoTo Exit_fImportToThinTable
End If
Else
MsgBox "Please provide name of wide table " _
& "with many number fields."
GoTo Exit_fImportToThinTable
End If


Plus...I forgot to mention that you may need to add
Reference to DAO library.

Good luck,

Gary Walter
 
G

Guest

Gary...

I can only say, "Amazing!!!". Did you already have this code in some form,
or did you write it just to solve my problem? If you did the latter, you
went above and beyond!!

Here's the rest of the story...

The table I am trying to look at, in my case, is a table that mirrors the
elements of a group of other tables which, in combination, make up a
"record". Data collection analysts collect data for those records.
Frequently, it is more productive if they can collect data that fills in
groups of fields across all assigned records rather than go field by field,
record by record.

I process the group of tablestha tmake up the "logical" records through
various logic to check for various types of errors. As I find an error, I
add 1 to the field of the same name in my "Status Counts" table. So now I
have a table with 1 record in my Status Counts table for each logical
"record" in my database. The fields in my Status Counts table (which have
the same names as the fields in my various other tables) have the count of
errors found for those fields for those records. Since each of those records
has been assigned to a data collection analyst, I can now sum the number of
errors per field per analyst.

And it is the results of THAT query that I feed to the routine you
presented, as pFromTable.

The result is that I now can display for each analyst a list of fieldnames
with counts of cumulative errors for each fieldname for the cross section of
records assigned to them, to show them where they need to spend more time to
be more complete in their collection efforts.

When I use pThinTable as the source of a query for a form, I will ignore
fields with a value of 0. In this way, every time the form is produced, the
list of fields with errors shrinks as the data collection gets more complete
and correct. By looking at the list of displayed fields, they can attack the
ones that have the highest error counts, and thus get the biggest bang for
their buck by focussing on those fields, or issues, accross all records,
instead of record by record. Of course, if they have to they can look at the
records in detail at any time, but we have found that giving them visual
clues about their completeness results in quicker, better quality results.

Many thanks again for your help!
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top