"(e-mail address removed)"
Hi. What if Microsoft added their own anti-virus, PDF
viewer, DVD decoder software and a fully functional
WinZip utility? Also add packet writing software like
InCd. Basically you could just install WindowsXP SP2 and
Office 2003 on your PC and that was it.
What, no Photoshop, no *full* version of Acrobat (rather than just
reader), no MathCAD, no office suite, no *full* defragmenter program
(rather than the crippled Diskeeper that it includes), no accounting
program, no Visual Studio .NET Pro, no OCR program, no
anti-[spyware|malware|hijack] utilities, no drive image program, no ...
yadda yadda. If you want all that pre-installed, I'm sure some jobber
will be more than willing to build it for you - at a price. Fact is,
Microsoft installing all this fluff just makes for a severely bloated
"operating system" (because none of it is really part of JUST an
operating system). During install, they should let the user decide
whether any or all of this extra fluff gets installed. Why would I want
their crippled Roxio CD burning software when I already or plan to use a
full and much more potent CD burning program? Why would I want their
anti-virus solution if I find one that exceeds theirs in coverage and
speed? Why would I want their particular DVD decoder when another more
robust and richer featured product exists and that I want to use? Why
would I want them to support .zip files if I already have a much faster
and richer featured product, like PKZip (which is faster than WinZip and
which doesn't have the CRC mis-recording problem of WinZip)? Why would
I even want packet writing to CDs which makes them incompatible with
some systems and has proven to NOT be a stable installable file system?
I'd like to pare *down* Windows (and instead use potent programs that
match MY specific needs), not bloat it up even more (with crippled or
superfluous fluff)! Why doesn't everyone give you their stuff for free?
Well, do you work for your employer for free?