Stephen said:
There's something that's been bothering me and I hope it's not taken the
wrong way. Why is it that the Web Designers on these groups have such
amateurish personal (and professional) websites. They sound so knowledgeable
in what they say but most sites look like a 10 year old designed them. Is it
because they're working so hard on other people's sites they neglect their
own? Sort of like the gourmet chef that eats TV dinner when he gets home
from work. I've known some maids and house cleaners whose home's were as
dirty as can be. Is it that sort of syndrome of are these people just full
of it?
In my opinion, you get three distinct kinds of webmaster....
1. CODERS - these guys are masters of their chosen languages, and
specialise in making the *engines* that drive the internet and make it
work. They aren't good with art and aesthetics, but they know how to
make things work.
2. DESIGNERS - these guys are artists. They know what looks good, and
how to create a website that has maximum visual impact. They aren't good
with tricky coding, but they can make a website that makes you say "wow!".
3. JACK OF ALL TRADES - these guys are fairly competent coders and also
have reasonable artistic abilities too. They're by no means an expert in
either, but they know enough about each subject to get by un-aided, and
even take time out to offer help and advice to others.
Number 3 is a very rare beast indeed. There are a few in this newsgroup,
but on the whole, you're probably most likely to meet Number 1 in this
group...
That's not a criticism of anyones skills or abilities. It's just an
observation that great designers rarely make great coders, and great
coders rarely make great designers....
In simple terms, different people have completely different skill-sets...