G
Guest
The 256-column limitation is extremely frustrating! I have to do headstands
to work around this. Why on earth would you limit to 256 columns? Just
because you want to store the column number as a byte? C'mon, this is 2007,
we have 64-bit processors now, bytes and 256 are ancient concepts!
-Paul
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...6-2c1f3492825c&dg=microsoft.public.excel.misc
to work around this. Why on earth would you limit to 256 columns? Just
because you want to store the column number as a byte? C'mon, this is 2007,
we have 64-bit processors now, bytes and 256 are ancient concepts!
-Paul
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...6-2c1f3492825c&dg=microsoft.public.excel.misc