Steve Rindsberg said:
OK, that accounts for the file size difference. You don't have an embedded sound per se,
but you DO have an embedded OLE object.
Many thanks! From that, and from more studying I've been doing
meanwhile, it's beginning to become a bit clearer. Put it this way:
it's now clear that it's even more complicated than I first thought!
And the more I read the more confused I get.
The difference? PowerPoint doesn't know what it is, just that it's an OLE object.
It will never play the sound automatically but you can rightclick the icon, choose Action
Settings and set it to Object Action: [choose an appropriate action - play, activate
contents, whatever]
OK, understood, and got that working OK.
Then it becomes clickable in slide show view and when you click it, it performs the
requested Object Action. Which may or may not work on other computers. on one PC here
with an MP3 file, clicking the icon brings up PPT's armwaving,hyperventilating "OH NO, MR
HANDS, this may have a VIRUS!" msgbox. When I click "There, there, dear. It's all right.
Daddy's here to protect you from the evil Mr. MP3", I then hear from Windows' "What is
this and what do you expect ME to do with it" dialog box.
It's beginning to look as if our ultimate objective will have to be
compromised. That was as follows:
1) Embed a file, ideally WMA but MP3 is close 2nd best, in a single
slide presentation. (It's for Italian language-teaching. The slide
shows each letter of the alphabet, and they are each spoken
alternately by male and female.)
2) Get it working on home PC.
3) Janet takes it to school on CD or laptop, and transfers to school
intranet network
4) In Janet's unavoidable absence, pass it to Supply teacher for
teaching (tomorrow I think).
5) Encourage pupils to PRACTISE AT HOME. They have restricted access
to school network, so the idea was to keep it really simple by getting
them to download just the *single* PPT file, and playing it.
But the approach using embedding is flawed. (BTW, whether it's an OLE
or a 'real' embedded file seems academic? Could we instead call it a
'non-linked' file? In the crucial sense that it works without the
sound file alongside it?) Anyway, the snags appear to be:
- It doesn't play automatically, which would be desirable
- It can't be paused as far as I can tell. I have to go to WMP (or
whatever music player is associated with it) and click Stop. On
re-focusing on PP, there's a risk of stopping the slideshow. Probably
best to minimise WMP instead, to see PP again.
- The player has to be closed if a second playing is required. If it's
just minimised, some quirk prevents it playing. The player stays
loaded and visible, but the 'now playing' entry vanishes.
Overall, I found it rather clumsy.
So I'm reconsidering linking instead, which PP's UI seems to be
designed for? Not sure of intranet upload and download implications
though...
---------
There's one very odd aspect of this that has piqued my curiosity. My
own player is actually MediaMonkey, but I don't think that's
significant. I had rigorously deleted the original WMA after making
the embedded PPT file, to ensure I wasn't using linking. On then
launching the PPT (either automatically or by clicking the OLE icon or
filename), MM duly played it OK. But when I examined the entry in MM's
Now Playing area, it showed it with this path:
C:\Documents and Settings\Terry Pinnell\Local Settings\Temporary
Internet Files\Content.IE5\0PMBK5AJ\
Puzzled, I deleted that, then played the (deleted!) object again, and
MM now found it here:
C:\Documents and Settings\Terry Pinnell\Local Settings\Temporary
Internet Files\Content.IE5\ETO36HQ9\
Also, the PPT is 648 KB, which is smaller than the combined size of
the original (22 KB) plus the WMA (833 KB). So is it somehow getting
compressed and then filed temporarily after running?
All very confusing! Any insights as to what's going on?
I tried to use Windows Explorer to find that folder, but couldn't do
so. I gather these 'Content.IE5' folders are hidden in some way other
than other 'hidden/system' files that I am configured to see. But why?
Not what I'd call a very digestible user experience. Or a predictable one.
Sure isn't!
Thanks for your interest and patience.