Outlook won't recognize pst file

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

outlook 2002 on XP home won't recognize pst file copied from Outlook 2002 on
XP Pro. Error messages " **.pst is not a compatable version of Personal
Folders Information service"
 
david Vos said:
outlook 2002 on XP home won't recognize pst file copied from Outlook 2002
on
XP Pro. Error messages " **.pst is not a compatable version of Personal
Folders Information service"

I suggest posting to one of the Outlook newsgroups. Look under
microsoft.public.outlook.
 
outlook 2002 on XP home won't recognize pst file copied from Outlook 2002 on
XP Pro. Error messages " **.pst is not a compatable version of Personal
Folders Information service"

We won't recognize your question since it has nothing to do with XP.
Try asking in a group with OUTLOOK in the title.
 
NoConsequence said:
We won't recognize your question since it has nothing to do with XP.
Try asking in a group with OUTLOOK in the title.

I have to ask, what is the point of your post here? The OP posted their
question yesterday, they received a reply with a suggestion to post to the
Outlook newsgroup. And another poster then confirmed that they have done
so. The OP hasn't replied back to this thread. And now 20 hours later you
are telling the OP the same thing and with some misinformation in it. I
would say that several of us recognized his question.

So what is the purpose?
 
guess he forgot to ask our resident net nanny for permission to post.

another virtual spanking.



(e-mail address removed)



Rock said:
We won't recognize your question since it has nothing to do with XP.
Try asking in a group with OUTLOOK in the title.

I have to ask, what is the point of your post here? The OP posted their
question yesterday, they received a reply with a suggestion to post to the
Outlook newsgroup. And another poster then confirmed that they have done
so. The OP hasn't replied back to this thread. And now 20 hours later you
are telling the OP the same thing and with some misinformation in it. I
would say that several of us recognized his question.

So what is the purpose?
 
Back
Top