N
nutso fasst
Outlook won't let me look at raw content of received e-mail, only the
header. So, when an e-mail that looks from the header like it might be legit
is filtered into my 'deleted' folder, how can I double-check content before
deletion?
If it is plain text, not a problem, I can view it. But if it is HTML it
might have embedded images. I don't want to view it and have Outlook reach
out to get the image file(s), thus informing the sender that the message has
been read.
I figured that if I saved the message as plain text, Outlook would not reach
out for any images. That does not appear to be the case. When I saved the
message my firewall showed an outgoing hit on port 80 at an address at
Hurricane Electric in Fremont, CA, a reputedly spam-friendly ISP. A few
seconds later I was hit with a flurry of attempted hits on port 80 on my
system, even though there is no web server there.
Was this an attempt to contact a trojan SPAM forwarder? I can't tell, but
both the SPAM e-mail and the incoming hits on port 80 were from addresses in
the Netherlands.
Anyway, I think it is strange that Outlook has no way to view raw e-mail
content, and even stranger that it would reach out for an image file
unnecessarily.
nf
header. So, when an e-mail that looks from the header like it might be legit
is filtered into my 'deleted' folder, how can I double-check content before
deletion?
If it is plain text, not a problem, I can view it. But if it is HTML it
might have embedded images. I don't want to view it and have Outlook reach
out to get the image file(s), thus informing the sender that the message has
been read.
I figured that if I saved the message as plain text, Outlook would not reach
out for any images. That does not appear to be the case. When I saved the
message my firewall showed an outgoing hit on port 80 at an address at
Hurricane Electric in Fremont, CA, a reputedly spam-friendly ISP. A few
seconds later I was hit with a flurry of attempted hits on port 80 on my
system, even though there is no web server there.
Was this an attempt to contact a trojan SPAM forwarder? I can't tell, but
both the SPAM e-mail and the incoming hits on port 80 were from addresses in
the Netherlands.
Anyway, I think it is strange that Outlook has no way to view raw e-mail
content, and even stranger that it would reach out for an image file
unnecessarily.
nf