G
Guest
The number of words in the filter list for SPAM and ADULT content
is a joke in Outlook 2000. I don't know if that has been improved in
Outlook 2003, but our company is not using 2003.
Our employees are being bombarded now with both SPAM and ADULT
e-mails and we have about 200,000 employees at Delphi Corp.
I realize that it takes scanning time and storage space to filter a subject
or e-mail body, but I'm sure you could spare 500 msec and a few KB and
outlook users would benefit.
Furthermore - why not make the filter list editable by the individual or
the system administrator. Then they could begin to head-off any specific
odd-titled messages that may slip through the basic defenses.
This is a real problem and I was surprised to see how sparsely the
filter list is populated by the world's greatest software company.
I like Microsoft and have been very pleased with all of your software,
but this is a real weak spot that could be easily improved.
is a joke in Outlook 2000. I don't know if that has been improved in
Outlook 2003, but our company is not using 2003.
Our employees are being bombarded now with both SPAM and ADULT
e-mails and we have about 200,000 employees at Delphi Corp.
I realize that it takes scanning time and storage space to filter a subject
or e-mail body, but I'm sure you could spare 500 msec and a few KB and
outlook users would benefit.
Furthermore - why not make the filter list editable by the individual or
the system administrator. Then they could begin to head-off any specific
odd-titled messages that may slip through the basic defenses.
This is a real problem and I was surprised to see how sparsely the
filter list is populated by the world's greatest software company.
I like Microsoft and have been very pleased with all of your software,
but this is a real weak spot that could be easily improved.