S
Steve Gould
Let me rephrase my earlier question. I have remote users that connect via
Dialup or VPN to gain access to Exchange server and network shares (in the
case of VPN users). I would like to implement different group policy based
on remote users versus local users. To do so I thought to create OU's
instead of sites as they make more sense in our case. We do have other
sites, but they are too small to warrant DC's/servers and run peer-to-peer
networking. No need to set up AD sites for them.
So if I create OU's to help apply different group policy I also want to have
separate User and Computer containers inside each OU. This will help make
the views more human readable. The only way I see to do this is to make
sub-OU's called User and Computer within my Local OU and Remote OU. This
seems strange to me. I would think I could nest non-OU type containers
inside of an OU for this reason.
Am I making sense? Is this understandable? Is this possible?
Dialup or VPN to gain access to Exchange server and network shares (in the
case of VPN users). I would like to implement different group policy based
on remote users versus local users. To do so I thought to create OU's
instead of sites as they make more sense in our case. We do have other
sites, but they are too small to warrant DC's/servers and run peer-to-peer
networking. No need to set up AD sites for them.
So if I create OU's to help apply different group policy I also want to have
separate User and Computer containers inside each OU. This will help make
the views more human readable. The only way I see to do this is to make
sub-OU's called User and Computer within my Local OU and Remote OU. This
seems strange to me. I would think I could nest non-OU type containers
inside of an OU for this reason.
Am I making sense? Is this understandable? Is this possible?