OT: Why do spammers delete their posts?

[John Doe]

A... spammers are just trying to save space in the Usenet archives

B... spammers are just trying to keep the archives beautiful

or

C... spammers are trying to cover up their tracks

 

[ric]

A... spammers are just trying to save space in the Usenet archives

B... spammers are just trying to keep the archives beautiful

or

C... spammers are trying to cover up their tracks

They don't. ISPs will cancel SPAM messages from their newsgroup servers.
I often don't see the actual SPAM message unless some idiot blurts out
SPAM!, and then quotes the whole thing back. Grrr...

 

[John Doe]

John Doe wrote:

They don't. ISPs will cancel SPAM messages from their newsgroup servers.
I often don't see the actual SPAM message unless some idiot blurts out
SPAM!,

In fact, what you're talking about is not the same, idiot?

and then quotes the whole thing back.

I almost always trim the text, liar?

Grrr...


Path: newssvr17.news.prodigy.com!newscon07.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!news-feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!cox.net!news-xfer.cox.net!p01!fed1read01.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <423C8B43.AFB6B6C2 home.com>
From: ric <nospam home.com>
Organization: None
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en]C-AtHome0405 (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Subject: Re: OT: Why do spammers delete their posts?
References: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 13
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:27:47 -0800
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.7.239.183
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
X-Trace: fed1read01 1111264056 68.7.239.183 (Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:27:36 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:27:36 EST
Xref: newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:431884

 

[David Maynard]

In fact, what you're talking about is not the same, idiot?

Maybe it would be more clear if you explained what you consider "the
archives" to be.

I almost always trim the text, liar?

It isn't wise to call someone a liar when their description is 100%
accurate with respect to the last one you quoted.

 

[John Doe]

A troll whose language becomes corrupt whenever he is pressed in
an argument.

 

[David Maynard]

A troll whose language becomes corrupt whenever he is pressed in
an argument.

If you think my last post was "corrupt" then you need either an eye or
mental exam.

 

[sbb78247]

A troll whose language becomes corrupt whenever he is pressed in
an argument.

<snip a bunch of useless crap>

****ing give up the spam cop shit.

S