Roger said:
You mean ...for sharing of the arranged visual display of documents..
Archiving and sharing of documents that you don't want edited. Yes.
If you are interested in achiving a certain visual display of a visual
arrangement of text and images for printing. If you want to archive the
actual content then pdf files are definitely not good, as you will have
big problems unpacking and accessing the content. PDF files are not
supposed to be unpacked. It is not a storage format, it is a visual
display format.
You are confused by what I mean by "archiving." I never claimed that
it was so you could go back and edit and change. I know PDFs are a
one-way-street. But they are currently the only one-way-street that
has been consistent for years. I have stuff written in earlier version
os MS Word that do not render the same on the current version.
If you want to take your family with you to another place you should
use a car or an aeroplane and put the actual family members in that
transport container.
If you only take a photo of your family with you it might not be
possible to restore the actual people from the photo when you arrive at
the new place.
When I want my mother-in-law 2,000 miles away (just far enough) to see
how cute my daughter looks dressed as Amelia Earhart I don't put her on
a plane and send her... I send a picture. The right tool for the job.
Yes, I know, taking a photo is very convenient, but it doesn't work for
storing or transporting the actual content. A photo is just a visual
display of the family.
And that's the exact purpose of a PDF (which was the OP's question).
PDF files are not good for archiving any kind of content, it is a way
to display a certain arrangement. Like if you take images and texts
and lay them out on a table in a certain arrangement and take a photo
of that arrangement, that photo can be printed out, or save to be
viewed again, but you cannot get the original images and text back from
a photo. Not without a lot of extra work and the help of special
software anyway. PDF files are like such photos of visually arranged
stuff.
Again, you are confused by my use of the word "archiving."
So you have a habit of choosing the most unsuitable file formats for
storing information.
Yes, I should have knows not to trust a little company to be in
business years later, or to be loadable on a new version of Windows, or
to have the same fonts and printer and printer ports available. The
PDF format is (for better or worse, it's not MY favorite either) firmly
established now. Even if Adobe vanishes, there are plenty of other
creation and viewing apps.
And what format SHOULD I have saved the wedding annoucement in? These
were the days when Windows still didn't really work. There AMI was the
only word processor that even tried to do WYSIWYG editing. The only
other DTP program for the home user was by Publish-IT! (another company
that's gone).
We will hear from you again. When you try to unpack the pdf files you
have created, so you can get back the original data. We will tell you
that it is maybe not even possible and ask you why you chose to save
the visual display of an arrangement of the data instead of storing the
data in some suitable file format for storing and transporting data,
like zip files, or mht files.
No you won't. I know that the best I'll get back from a PDF is raw
text (if it's not too close to a graphic object) and a medium-res
"print." You'll be happy to know that I already take your suggestion
and have source documents available in ZIP files; they are safely
stored on single-sided low-density Atari 800 5.25" disks. I think they
were written in a program called SuperScript (but I can't be sure after
25 years). It's nice to know I have those instead of some
machine-independant display format. I do have some files that I moved
to my PC with a nul-modem cable. But all of the word processing
programs I've tried seem to have a little problem with the files. All
they show is a mess of extended characters. Go figure.