optimal cluster size?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

good morning - i am running an xp home machine, with a 40 Gb boot drive, and
a 200Gb data drive. The data drive is partitioned with 512 byte clusters;
the boot drive with 4 Kb clusters. Would it be advisable to resize the boot
drive with 512 byte clusters? I am a photographer running, primarily,
PhotoShop CS, Illustrator CS, Flash MX and Dreamweaver MX. PhotoShop uses
the data drive as a scratch disk, often with files approaching 200 Mb, hence
the question about both compatibility and speed with regard to the disparity
of cluster sizes.

Any and all answers appreciated.

alan staats
 
You'd be better off with 4 KB cluster on both drives. Since
your data files are large, you are not really saving any
significant amount of space/ If you had a lot of small, 1
and 2 KB files, small cluster would save some wasted space,
but with bigger files you are just running a more work
intensive cluster size.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.


in message
| good morning - i am running an xp home machine, with a 40
Gb boot drive, and
| a 200Gb data drive. The data drive is partitioned with
512 byte clusters;
| the boot drive with 4 Kb clusters. Would it be advisable
to resize the boot
| drive with 512 byte clusters? I am a photographer
running, primarily,
| PhotoShop CS, Illustrator CS, Flash MX and Dreamweaver MX.
PhotoShop uses
| the data drive as a scratch disk, often with files
approaching 200 Mb, hence
| the question about both compatibility and speed with
regard to the disparity
| of cluster sizes.
|
| Any and all answers appreciated.
|
| alan staats
| --
| photo:staats
 
....will a 4 Kb cluster size speed things up a bit? that, primarily, is what
i am looking for. i can buy more hard drives... time, on the other hand, is
irreplaceable.

alan staats
 
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 06:33:03 -0800, "photostaats"
good morning - i am running an xp home machine, with a 40 Gb boot drive, and
a 200Gb data drive. The data drive is partitioned with 512 byte clusters;
the boot drive with 4 Kb clusters. Would it be advisable to resize the boot
drive with 512 byte clusters?

No - you'd expect a significant slowdown.

4k is the best size for anything that may be paged to or from disk,
such as system code, as it's the CPU's natural paging size.

512-byte clusters mean huge numbers of clusters and fragmentation.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Optimum Cluster Sizes for NTFS Win 2000? 1
Cluster size problem 2
Hard Disk Failure 21
NTFS Cluster size 5
CLuster size 2
Best NTFS Cluster Size for boot drive? 7
Cluster Size 1
BIOS don't find boot record 3

Back
Top