Douglas said:
Any shared application should be split. However, that doesn't address your
problem, does it?
Are you sure you both were using the same database? Access 2003 won't allow
you to change table definitions unless you're the only user.
Again, agreed. This is a "home grown" application created by the users
and is accessed by only 2 people. Perhaps if it ever grows beyond its
current volume of usage redesigning it into a split database would be in
order.
I should also clarify that I did not attempt to save design changes to
the table. This would almost certainly not have been allowed. I was
merely surprised to see that it would even allow me in to design view
while in exclusive mode (since not allowing design changes without
having exclusive access is not allowed, as you said, even in "regular"
mode).
As far as the same database goes, two of us opened the same database
sitting at desks adjacent to one another, and we're both programmers.
So, if we opened 2 separate databases, well... you draw your own
conclusions about us.
Now... we both checked the "Exclusive" radio button under "Default open
mode" on the tools/options/advanced tab and also read the standard help
which reads "To open the database with exclusive (exclusive: A type of
access to data in a database that is shared over a network. When you
open a database in exclusive mode, you prevent others from opening the
database.) access, click the arrow next to the Open button, and then
click Open Exclusive." subsequent to which we went through the Open
dialog box to select "Exclusive" option as another approach to get the
same intended result.
It still allowed both of us to access the database and make data
changes. In short, it behaved exactly as though we had not selected this
option.
Darrell