New PC - comments?

N

Noozer

Hey all... Just ordered a bunch of parts for a new PC.

Mainboard - DFI LanParty UT NF4 UltraD + SLI bridge connector
DVDRW - BenQ DW1655 Lightscribe
CPU - AMD Opteron 165 dualcore @1.8 Ghz
CPU HS- Arctic Cooling Silencer 64 Ultra TC
Video - EVGA e-Geforce 7600 GT CO
Video HS - Zalman VF700-CU (also have a JetArt JACSH1 cooler)
Sound - AuzenTech HDA X-Plosion 7.1 DTS PCI
TV Tuner - Sapphire Theatrix Theater 550 Pro PCI
Modem - AOpen FM56-PX (for faxing, voicemail and caller ID)
Case - Inwin C583K5
Floppy - Sony, black
Card reader - Peripower ICR32 32-in-1 reader with USB + firewire.

Will be utilizing my existing 2x256 OCZ DDR 533 memory, 40gig Raptor SATA
and 300gig Maxtor drives, and my current 450 watt PSU.


Uses for this PC? Windows MCE media station and some gaming on my 57" TV.

So... not too bad?
 
D

Darklight

Noozer said:
Hey all... Just ordered a bunch of parts for a new PC.

Mainboard - DFI LanParty UT NF4 UltraD + SLI bridge connector
DVDRW - BenQ DW1655 Lightscribe
CPU - AMD Opteron 165 dualcore @1.8 Ghz
CPU HS- Arctic Cooling Silencer 64 Ultra TC
Video - EVGA e-Geforce 7600 GT CO
Video HS - Zalman VF700-CU (also have a JetArt JACSH1 cooler)
Sound - AuzenTech HDA X-Plosion 7.1 DTS PCI
TV Tuner - Sapphire Theatrix Theater 550 Pro PCI
Modem - AOpen FM56-PX (for faxing, voicemail and caller ID)
Case - Inwin C583K5
Floppy - Sony, black
Card reader - Peripower ICR32 32-in-1 reader with USB + firewire.

Will be utilizing my existing 2x256 OCZ DDR 533 memory, 40gig Raptor SATA
and 300gig Maxtor drives, and my current 450 watt PSU.


Uses for this PC? Windows MCE media station and some gaming on my 57" TV.

So... not too bad?

it would of been better to ask for comments before buying parts
 
T

Tad Confused

Noozer said:
Hey all... Just ordered a bunch of parts for a new PC.

Mainboard - DFI LanParty UT NF4 UltraD + SLI bridge connector
DVDRW - BenQ DW1655 Lightscribe
CPU - AMD Opteron 165 dualcore @1.8 Ghz
CPU HS- Arctic Cooling Silencer 64 Ultra TC
Video - EVGA e-Geforce 7600 GT CO
Video HS - Zalman VF700-CU (also have a JetArt JACSH1 cooler)
Sound - AuzenTech HDA X-Plosion 7.1 DTS PCI
TV Tuner - Sapphire Theatrix Theater 550 Pro PCI
Modem - AOpen FM56-PX (for faxing, voicemail and caller ID)
Case - Inwin C583K5
Floppy - Sony, black
Card reader - Peripower ICR32 32-in-1 reader with USB + firewire.

Will be utilizing my existing 2x256 OCZ DDR 533 memory, 40gig Raptor SATA
and 300gig Maxtor drives, and my current 450 watt PSU.


Uses for this PC? Windows MCE media station and some gaming on my 57" TV.

So... not too bad?

I alway think if you are buying a new PC you should future proof
yourself and go for as much as you can afford.
 
K

kony

Hey all... Just ordered a bunch of parts for a new PC.

Mainboard - DFI LanParty UT NF4 UltraD + SLI bridge connector
DVDRW - BenQ DW1655 Lightscribe
CPU - AMD Opteron 165 dualcore @1.8 Ghz
CPU HS- Arctic Cooling Silencer 64 Ultra TC
Video - EVGA e-Geforce 7600 GT CO
Video HS - Zalman VF700-CU (also have a JetArt JACSH1 cooler)
Sound - AuzenTech HDA X-Plosion 7.1 DTS PCI
TV Tuner - Sapphire Theatrix Theater 550 Pro PCI
Modem - AOpen FM56-PX (for faxing, voicemail and caller ID)
Case - Inwin C583K5
Floppy - Sony, black
Card reader - Peripower ICR32 32-in-1 reader with USB + firewire.

Will be utilizing my existing 2x256 OCZ DDR 533 memory, 40gig Raptor SATA
and 300gig Maxtor drives, and my current 450 watt PSU.


Uses for this PC? Windows MCE media station and some gaming on my 57" TV.

So... not too bad?


Not bad, but since you asked for comments I"ll highlight the
weaker areas - since you already knew the positives, hence
you bought the parts.

DFI boards tend to be lower quality, may have shorter
lifespan. Might not matter to you if you upgrade regularly
but someone else might've used this system a few years from
now, if anything a modern system would be expected to have a
longer viable life than one built 10 years ago.

Arctic Cooling uses junk fans, you will probably need to
relube it or replace it while you own it, else it's life
becomes shorter still and noisier.

Not enough memory, rest of system makes it appropriate to
have at least 1GB, particularly if this system will be used
later with Vista.

Now the bad news, the Opteron is mostly a waste for your
uses... a single core CPU with highest clockspeed will be
the most cost effective for this use.
 
N

Noozer

Uses for this PC? Windows MCE media station and some gaming on my 57" TV.
it would of been better to ask for comments before buying parts

Actually, I had posted questions a while back for some of this stuff.

Based my purchase on my current MCE experience (Celeron 2.6Ghz) and what
future needs I might have later (ie, Dual Gig LAN will be helpful when this
gets old and moves into the basement as a server)
 
N

Noozer

Mainboard - DFI LanParty UT NF4 UltraD + SLI bridge connector
Not bad, but since you asked for comments I"ll highlight the
weaker areas - since you already knew the positives, hence
you bought the parts.

Definately appreciated.
DFI boards tend to be lower quality, may have shorter
lifespan. Might not matter to you if you upgrade regularly
but someone else might've used this system a few years from
now, if anything a modern system would be expected to have a
longer viable life than one built 10 years ago.

Really? I hadn't come across this in the reviews. They looked to me to be a
"noob" on the scene, so they make their products appealing across several
fronts - features, overclocking, price, etc.
Arctic Cooling uses junk fans, you will probably need to
relube it or replace it while you own it, else it's life
becomes shorter still and noisier.

Well. I'm hoping that being thermally controlled will lengthen it's life
span. I currently have a Zalman ALCU on my P4 and it's starting to make
noise. I'm hoping to have a quiet cooler with improved cooling being
secondary.
Not enough memory, rest of system makes it appropriate to
have at least 1GB, particularly if this system will be used
later with Vista.

Ya, I know... Currently I've got 2x256meg of the DDR533 and 2x512 of DDR400.
Now the bad news, the Opteron is mostly a waste for your
uses... a single core CPU with highest clockspeed will be
the most cost effective for this use.

The problems I originally had on my old MCE machine were caused by too much
activity on the Celeron at once. I was hoping that with a dual core that the
MCE recording process could utilize one core while my other apps run on the
other.

After reading what you've said I'm starting to reconsider my plans.

I currently use a 2.6Ghz P4, clocked to 3Ghz for a workstation. That's where
some of the parts are coming from. Now I'm thinking of using the new Opteron
system for my workstation, with 512meg of fast memory and putting the P4
into the MCE role with 1gig of DDR400 and the AGP 6800GS.

Thanks for the feedback!
 
M

~misfit~

Noozer said:
Really? I hadn't come across this in the reviews. They looked to me
to be a "noob" on the scene, so they make their products appealing
across several fronts - features, overclocking, price, etc.

I had a DFI board in my Pentium 133MHz system way back when, over 10 years
ago. That's when I first found out it stood for "Diamond Flower
Incorporated", by RingTFM.
 
K

kony

Really? I hadn't come across this in the reviews. They looked to me to be a
"noob" on the scene, so they make their products appealing across several
fronts - features, overclocking, price, etc.

That's the problem with reviews. They just plug in the most
popular parts in one set config, rarely a few common configs
and run benchmarks. Any product that isn't defective will
pass in these kinds of overviews but the unforseen bugs, and
the lifespan, cannot be revealed by reviewers. I'd take a
DFI over a typical PCChips board, but they're not close to
as good as Asus, MSI, Gigabyte or Abit. It'll be a shame
when Abit goes under, and Gigabyte seems more recently to be
going in two opposing extreme directions, lower end boards
and very expensive higher end boards.


Well. I'm hoping that being thermally controlled will lengthen it's life
span. I currently have a Zalman ALCU on my P4 and it's starting to make
noise. I'm hoping to have a quiet cooler with improved cooling being
secondary.

The lower RPM will help, but presuming it has a sleeve
bearing fan it will still be useful to lube it every year or
so.


The problems I originally had on my old MCE machine were caused by too much
activity on the Celeron at once. I was hoping that with a dual core that the
MCE recording process could utilize one core while my other apps run on the
other.

Ok, I didn't/don't know how much you'll be multitasking.
Dual core would defintely help if you were video capturing
while gaming, or any other use where there are two
simultaneous tasks with need for timely performance,
realtime events.

After reading what you've said I'm starting to reconsider my plans.

I currently use a 2.6Ghz P4, clocked to 3Ghz for a workstation. That's where
some of the parts are coming from. Now I'm thinking of using the new Opteron
system for my workstation, with 512meg of fast memory and putting the P4
into the MCE role with 1gig of DDR400 and the AGP 6800GS.

Thanks for the feedback!

I was mainly speaking of the gaming, that it tends to be the
most demanding task particularly if your video capture uses
hardware MPEG compression. You can benchmark though, in the
most demanding scenario it'll see... it's hard to know what
that'll be.
 
J

JohnS

The problems I originally had on my old MCE machine were caused by too much
activity on the Celeron at once. I was hoping that with a dual core that the
MCE recording process could utilize one core while my other apps run on the
other.

After reading what you've said I'm starting to reconsider my plans.

I currently use a 2.6Ghz P4, clocked to 3Ghz for a workstation. That's where
some of the parts are coming from. Now I'm thinking of using the new Opteron
system for my workstation, with 512meg of fast memory and putting the P4
into the MCE role with 1gig of DDR400 and the AGP 6800GS.

Thanks for the feedback!

I think either one would work OK. The thing with the single core vs
dual core though for home theater use I dont think it makes a lot of
difference is either way the dual core looked like a better deal when
I looked at it a while ago. Things may have changed very recently as I
havent checked the prices. However someone asked the same question and
I was really surprised to see the prices of the single core were very
high near the same speeds. In fact given the deals that were going
around at the time on the dual 3800 or opteron 165 the single core was
actually higher at the time ! I was surprised. Given that and the
fact the opteron can OC really well it was like a nobrainer for the
Opteron but if you have two to use like in your case where you already
have a Pent and can choose then I guess youd get more use out of it as
a workstation than a HTPC .

The DFI ----- theres actually a strong fan base for the make. They
think its one of the best OCing boards. However I looked some boards
up cause there were refurbs for cheap briefly and some of the boards I
was really surprised at the bad reviews at Newegg. Not all of them or
even maybe most of them but given the hype about them I was really
surprised. That doesnt mean they are bad boards or anything but Id
defintely read up on some consumer feedback on the model you are
buying.

Frankly I really like boards with longer than 1 year warranties
nowadays after my bad experience with boards lately. Ironic since I
bought a chaintech which has a 1 year warranty aftrer Ive been saying
I want 3 year warrany boards. In fact even more ironic I did RMA my
chaintech right after the 1 year warranty period and luckily they
honored it anyway as I truthfully said Id been having problems with it
way before 1 year was up.

It seems fine now but now my big thing is looking for boards that dont
have nforce chips too close to the PCI express slots since the cooler
gets in the way of PCI express cards as I mentioned in my rant about
the 550 Power Color TV tuner card. This whole PCI express thing just
seems like a mess and the MB designs seem all over the map nowadays
though luckilyfor the MB makers no one is using PCI express cards so
it doesnt matter if the nforce cooling heatsink/fan is in the way or
not. Im going to dispute the charge if Newegg doesnt give me a full
refund. Im sick of all these hassles. Maybe Ill stick to my cheapo
Norwood TV card for awhile Im so disgusted. If Id just kept my 150
Hauppauge I wouldnt be spending a dime more and having all this
hassle.
 
K

kony

It seems fine now but now my big thing is looking for boards that dont
have nforce chips too close to the PCI express slots since the cooler
gets in the way of PCI express cards as I mentioned in my rant about
the 550 Power Color TV tuner card. This whole PCI express thing just
seems like a mess and the MB designs seem all over the map nowadays
though luckilyfor the MB makers no one is using PCI express cards so
it doesnt matter if the nforce cooling heatsink/fan is in the way or
not. Im going to dispute the charge if Newegg doesnt give me a full
refund. Im sick of all these hassles. Maybe Ill stick to my cheapo
Norwood TV card for awhile Im so disgusted. If Id just kept my 150
Hauppauge I wouldnt be spending a dime more and having all this
hassle.

If you were really determined, you might be able to *make*
something work. take a high quality slim heatsink,
something like an Alpha which are usually fairly expensive
but that's typical of premier heatsink manufacturers rather
than PC toy/mod/etc aftermarket products.

I happen know of a place that has some of these low profile
Alpha 'sinks though but I've no idea if they ship outside
continental US.
http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G13955

They're also handy for moderate-heat video cards as there
are mounting holes for a 60mm fan, though I don't recall
what the holes are tapped to, maybe 4-40 or maybe not, it's
definitely a fine threaded screw hole. The catch is there
is no mounting provision and that for many uses they're too
big. Being too big can be a benefit though... it'd require
taking a grinder or saw/etc to cut them to fit, but it also
means that once cut to fit, it's a larger surface area than
something small enough to fit in the designated zone.
Essentially that's of great benefit to someone that needs a
short 'sink but to still have good cooling without a tiny
loud fan.

I can't be sure 15mm is short enough though, but if worst
came to worst you could put it on a belt sander for awhile
to take off some of the pin height but it'd have to be fine
grit sandpaper as the fins are really, really tiny relative
to most 'sinks... smaller pins than on the bigger Alpha
'sinks made for CPUs. Another 'sink would work too, of
course, but finding one of good quality in a low profile is
a chore unless you just settled for something from the CPU
'sink in an old 486 or early Pentium 1 era system and these
too would probably need size-reduced to fit on any given
board.

Mounting could require bending up some spring metal or using
a press (maybe I hand drill, I haven't tried that) to get
the holes in the right places for a stock-like springed-stud
type mounting like many SB 'sinks use, it'd probably be
easier to overdrill the hole to remove the full pins around
the hole then use a tiny washer to stop the springed-pin.
I've no idea what hardware stores are like there though, nor
what odd little parts you might already have to use. DIY
'sinks are more challenging to mount but if you value the
warranty on the board it might be worthwhile instead of
using some permanent epoxy to attach it to the SB... and if
you used permanent epoxy, you'd want it on the SB carrier
too, not just attaching the 'sink to the core on a flipchip
alone as such a large 'sink can put a lot of leverage
against whatever it's mounted to... it'd be risky on an open
flipchip. It'd be nice if nVidia et al started putting HQ
heat spreaders on all their open flipchips and maybe even a
more universal and robust heatsink mounting method.

I don't see them moving the SB too far out of the way
though, it could pose signal routing issues and/or degrade
performance.
 
J

JohnS

Mounting could require bending up some spring metal or using
a press (maybe I hand drill, I haven't tried that) to get
the holes in the right places for a stock-like springed-stud
type mounting like many SB 'sinks use, it'd probably be
easier to overdrill the hole to remove the full pins around
the hole then use a tiny washer to stop the springed-pin.
I've no idea what hardware stores are like there though, nor
what odd little parts you might already have to use. DIY
'sinks are more challenging to mount but if you value the
warranty on the board it might be worthwhile instead of
using some permanent epoxy to attach it to the SB... and if
you used permanent epoxy, you'd want it on the SB carrier
too, not just attaching the 'sink to the core on a flipchip
alone as such a large 'sink can put a lot of leverage
against whatever it's mounted to... it'd be risky on an open
flipchip. It'd be nice if nVidia et al started putting HQ
heat spreaders on all their open flipchips and maybe even a
more universal and robust heatsink mounting method.
I don't see them moving the SB too far out of the way
though, it could pose signal routing issues and/or degrade
performance.

I think this may be one of the most promising ways to fix the problem
http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticle&articID=418

The problem is its not sold in the US reading the articles on it. Why
they sent out samples to various test sites is beyond me. One place
online lists it for sale but it says out of stock. They say its only
sold in Taiwan. The other problem is like I thought $38 or so listed
at the site which claims to sell it. Way too high. With shipping it
would be over $40. I can get various whole new MBs in the 80-100 range
with the cooler out of the way like an MSI.

Another possibility though this one brings out one of the problems ---
the whole thing about the PCI express mess , QC and design of the MBs
seeming to be really iffy nowadays especially in light of all the
financial problems of the makers. And specifically the problem of
nforce4 chip cooling.

Take a look at some of the reviews of the boards at Newegg:
Like this MSI nforce4 though the overall rating from the people with
boards that worked pushed it up and who knows if Newegg was filtering
the replies since they deleted a review I made on a board a while back
and it wasnt even that bad a review just lukewarm but with a warning.
There are disturbing amounts of posts scattered about failing boards
in a short time.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/CustRatingReview.asp?Item=N82E16813130491

Same with DFI
Good overall rating but disturbing amount of failed board reviews in a
short time and once again who know how filtered the responses are.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813136163

I noticed one thing about the DFI board they talk about how hot the
nforce4 chip was and how noisy and super RPM the fan was on it.
If you take a look the fan on it its different than the usual chip set
cooler setup I think though I maybe wrong. It looks like its recessed
like some graphics chip coolers. You know they have the fan sitting in
a tray with the fins around the fan but the fan itself is recessed
into the heatsink so the whole thing is 5/8 of an inch thick or so.
Thats what you would need. And of course in this case they placed it
behind the PCI slots just an example of the all over the map design of
the nforce4 layouts. Basically the whole thing has to be around
1/4-5/8 or so thick. Putting alow profile fan ontop of a regular low
profile heatsink is too high. The cheapest solution is the DFI
approach with the recessed flush with the heatsink fan which should
cost maybe 6-10 bucks max like any other chip cooler fan. However DFI
consumers here complain that its super high rpm and that it doesnt
cool that well etc. Maybe cause the heatsinks seem cut off below the
fan to make it recessed?

If you notice though the first fan is difference from this recessed
one they use on the much praised DFI LAN party

http://tinyurl.com/dhml9

This one looks recessed too flush with the top of the PCI slots.
However besides being oval in shape , the fan looks bigger. I assume
it works better as I dont see as much whining about the noisly cooling
fan etc in the reviews and hot chip. However you can see the position
of this is behind the PCI express chip very close to the end of the
video slot so if it isnt flush with the top as it looks to be youll
have the same problem.

This problem is exacerbated with the Chaintech because most of the
nforce boards are now crammed with junk its getting a bit crowded and
the layouts seem to be a bit haphazard if you look at all the makes.
Add to that Chaintech Ive since learned shrunk their board a bit
making things worse probably to save a bit of money and there seems to
be no room to move anything anywhere else its so crammed which
probably necessitated the placement of the chip there. However they
seemed to once again either not done their homework or just didnt care
and got a standard chipset cooler which is too tall for that position.
Ive seen other boards too that have this problem in various degrees
though but Chaintech seems to be one of the worst. You really need a
cooling solution flush with the tops of the PCI express slots or they
may end up useless which theyve been anyway given the lack of cards
but even with cards coming out they may be useless.

Could be possible to find a graphics card cooler which tend to be thin
and recessed like the DFI cooler and use it. But you would have to ask
or buy it and test it and if it didnt work buy another and test it.

Why people were pointing this out all over the place since its been a
YEAR since these boards came out is beyond me.

Add to that the weird latency problems with DAWs ---- PCI express I
thought was supposed to be BETTER than PCI . Theres been long running
threads on the problems with latency and PCI express nforce4 and to a
lesser extent INTEL boards. Also no cards for over a year?

I called Newegg they wanted a 15% restocking fee. I had to threaten a
CC dispute to get a refund and I dont think they are going to refund
my shipping.

Costs even without restocking if they charge shipping:

$16 shipping for old card
$8-10 to ship it back
$16 shipping for new card

Its mindboggling enough without a restocking fee.

Over $40 for all the shipping costs for a TV tuner card
and then add tax too I think. The card
with rebate was $65 almost doubles the cost.

Thats why buying from newegg for me is russian roulette.
Possibly a disaster if I have any problems at all with any of the
items. I think Im going back to UGH Amazon.
Its kind of like which seller online is worse at this point. Amazon
Ive had horrible experiences with lately. They clearly had a big
mistake in their advertising of an Audigy and wouldnt make things
right and even denied it happened. What was maddening though was some
of the CSRs easily gave full price adjustments no sweat to a some
callers while other kept denying even lied and tried everything and
anything to squirm out of any adjustments even after others including
me called 4-7 times ! Each time we got different stories. However one
thing Amazon does do is give full refunds and free shipping back.
 
K

kony

I think this may be one of the most promising ways to fix the problem
http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticle&articID=418


That's an interesting product. On the one hand it's nice
that they did all the work for us, but geeze(!), couldn't
they include a decent fan? Crazy how such a common failure
point is so easily ignored on products. Blame reviewers
though, they may rate noise but seldom a really good
analysis of whether the product is expected to serve it's
purpose for the life of the system or be yet another
maintenance issue.

It looks awefully big and heavy too, I almost think I'd go
with water-cooling first and I have managed to run even
highly o'c systems up till now without any *need* to do
that. At least the fan on it is a standard size, easily
enough replaced if/when necessary.
The problem is its not sold in the US reading the articles on it. Why
they sent out samples to various test sites is beyond me. One place
online lists it for sale but it says out of stock. They say its only
sold in Taiwan. The other problem is like I thought $38 or so listed
at the site which claims to sell it. Way too high. With shipping it
would be over $40. I can get various whole new MBs in the 80-100 range
with the cooler out of the way like an MSI.

Another possibility though this one brings out one of the problems ---
the whole thing about the PCI express mess , QC and design of the MBs
seeming to be really iffy nowadays especially in light of all the
financial problems of the makers. And specifically the problem of
nforce4 chip cooling.

Well we could see it coming though, faster speeds and lower
core sizes make higher heat density inevitable until they
can manage to find some new materials. Funny thing is, back
in the earlier Athlon days people frowned on highly o'c
Athlons claiming they produced way too much heat (I had some
putting out over 100W under full load), then those same
Intel zealots turned around and bought Prescotts producing
that much heat in stock config but then the Intel retail
'sink which was louder. Context is funny sometimes.

Take a look at some of the reviews of the boards at Newegg:
Like this MSI nforce4 though the overall rating from the people with
boards that worked pushed it up and who knows if Newegg was filtering
the replies since they deleted a review I made on a board a while back
and it wasnt even that bad a review just lukewarm but with a warning.
There are disturbing amounts of posts scattered about failing boards
in a short time.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/CustRatingReview.asp?Item=N82E16813130491

It could be the boards, but then again every other day it
seems like someone is claiming they got such a great deal on
their $20 500W PSU... so it seems they may not know what
they're doing enough to know which part is truely to blame.
I ask that question a few times when it comes to PSU
threads... "If the power supply kills the board, will you
blame the right part?".

Same with DFI
Good overall rating but disturbing amount of failed board reviews in a
short time and once again who know how filtered the responses are.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813136163

I noticed one thing about the DFI board they talk about how hot the
nforce4 chip was and how noisy and super RPM the fan was on it.
If you take a look the fan on it its different than the usual chip set
cooler setup I think though I maybe wrong. It looks like its recessed
like some graphics chip coolers. You know they have the fan sitting in
a tray with the fins around the fan but the fan itself is recessed
into the heatsink so the whole thing is 5/8 of an inch thick or so.

Yeah I hate those, they may be thinner but they never seem
to run very long and are impossible to replace (just the
fan). It's somewhat ironic that of all the possible ways to
cool things, they always seem to find some way to muck up
such simple things in this day and age, with cooling being
one of the few technologies as old as the hills.

Thats what you would need. And of course in this case they placed it
behind the PCI slots just an example of the all over the map design of
the nforce4 layouts. Basically the whole thing has to be around
1/4-5/8 or so thick. Putting alow profile fan ontop of a regular low
profile heatsink is too high. The cheapest solution is the DFI
approach with the recessed flush with the heatsink fan which should
cost maybe 6-10 bucks max like any other chip cooler fan. However DFI
consumers here complain that its super high rpm and that it doesnt
cool that well etc. Maybe cause the heatsinks seem cut off below the
fan to make it recessed?

Tiny thin fans move very little air to begin with then
squeezing it into a 'sink makes it worse. Then the fan
wears and wobbles in the bearing and RPM drops but noise
doesn't. The metal over the core is so thin too, when the
one area it needs to be thick is there. I'm not a big fan
of those TMD fans but if ever there was a good place for one
it would seem to be here so the center mass of the fan could
be smaller. Even so, fan longevity (as related to wobble)
has a lot to do with how deep the bearing is... I try not to
ever use fans less than 15mm thick and that would leave no
room for the 'sink even if the fan were recessed into it.


If you notice though the first fan is difference from this recessed
one they use on the much praised DFI LAN party

http://tinyurl.com/dhml9

That's a lot like the 5 or 6 video card fans I pull off
right after I stress test new cards (to make sure they work
ok before moddin' the cooling). I kept them thinking I'd
use 'em someday but never did they seem a better option than
some other alternative.

This one looks recessed too flush with the top of the PCI slots.
However besides being oval in shape , the fan looks bigger. I assume
it works better as I dont see as much whining about the noisly cooling
fan etc in the reviews and hot chip. However you can see the position
of this is behind the PCI express chip very close to the end of the
video slot so if it isnt flush with the top as it looks to be youll
have the same problem.

I'd still prefer an entirely passive 'sink then if
necessary, put a fan bracket in the case and point a fan at
it. I do a fair bit of metal fabrication as a hobby though,
it would be easier (quicker and cheaper) for me than for
some people to do this. Plus, I always pre-plan a system
before building it, as it's always a PITA to strip down a
system so if I even suspect a fan might be desirable later
I'd go ahead and drill some holes in the motherboard tray
for a bracket... then if it isn't needed, there are only a
couple of holes but they look stock if done carefully.

This problem is exacerbated with the Chaintech because most of the
nforce boards are now crammed with junk its getting a bit crowded and
the layouts seem to be a bit haphazard if you look at all the makes.
Add to that Chaintech Ive since learned shrunk their board a bit
making things worse probably to save a bit of money and there seems to
be no room to move anything anywhere else its so crammed which
probably necessitated the placement of the chip there. However they
seemed to once again either not done their homework or just didnt care
and got a standard chipset cooler which is too tall for that position.
Ive seen other boards too that have this problem in various degrees
though but Chaintech seems to be one of the worst. You really need a
cooling solution flush with the tops of the PCI express slots or they
may end up useless which theyve been anyway given the lack of cards
but even with cards coming out they may be useless.

There is another option, maybe. Get a tall passive 'sink
with well spaced out fins, then just take a grinder (or if
they're spaced out enough, pliers can bend the fins near
their bases till they snap off) and remove a sort of channel
through the 'sink that allows the card to sit IN the
channel. If there are portions of the card that might short
out (common, since the cards may have copper on their entire
surface) then take some heat-shrink tubing and put it over
the pins (which rules out the fin based 'sinks of course,
but maybe some plastic sheeting with adhesive on it would
work for those but I've never tried it).

Could be possible to find a graphics card cooler which tend to be thin
and recessed like the DFI cooler and use it. But you would have to ask
or buy it and test it and if it didnt work buy another and test it.

Why people were pointing this out all over the place since its been a
YEAR since these boards came out is beyond me.

Well there were so few PCI express cards, few may have come
across the issue yet.

Add to that the weird latency problems with DAWs ---- PCI express I
thought was supposed to be BETTER than PCI . Theres been long running
threads on the problems with latency and PCI express nforce4 and to a
lesser extent INTEL boards. Also no cards for over a year?

I think part of the problem is the OEMs... they'll rely a
lot on integrated features and if an add-on card is needed
they would only have one or two, so the legacy PCI slots are
enough.

I called Newegg they wanted a 15% restocking fee. I had to threaten a
CC dispute to get a refund and I dont think they are going to refund
my shipping.

Costs even without restocking if they charge shipping:

$16 shipping for old card
$8-10 to ship it back
$16 shipping for new card

Its mindboggling enough without a restocking fee.

Over $40 for all the shipping costs for a TV tuner card
and then add tax too I think. The card
with rebate was $65 almost doubles the cost.

Yep it's bad when you have those extra costs, I'd wonder
what it would go for on ebay locally (so shipping to buyer
is lower).

Thats why buying from newegg for me is russian roulette.
Possibly a disaster if I have any problems at all with any of the
items. I think Im going back to UGH Amazon.
Its kind of like which seller online is worse at this point. Amazon
Ive had horrible experiences with lately. They clearly had a big
mistake in their advertising of an Audigy and wouldnt make things
right and even denied it happened.

I've never had a problem with Amazon but I seldom use them
as they charge tax in my state, making the total cost always
a few % higher than someplace else.
What was maddening though was some
of the CSRs easily gave full price adjustments no sweat to a some
callers while other kept denying even lied and tried everything and
anything to squirm out of any adjustments even after others including
me called 4-7 times ! Each time we got different stories. However one
thing Amazon does do is give full refunds and free shipping back.

Sometimes I wonder if their answer depends on the product,
that maybe some products have high return rates for issues
such as you had and to mitigate their losses, they'll make
every effort to charge the fees.
 
J

JohnS

It looks awefully big and heavy too, I almost think I'd go
with water-cooling first and I have managed to run even
highly o'c systems up till now without any *need* to do
that. At least the fan on it is a standard size, easily
enough replaced if/when necessary.

I always thought heatpipes were a ridiculous option mainly for teens
you know like painting flames on your PC case or skull decals ---
though they more or less work it was mainly for looks and to sell more
cool looking gadgets to modders. I can see now with MBs being so
crammed positioning of various items becomes a problem so heatpipes
can be very useful though it adds to the cost. I noticed several newer
boards come with them.

If that plate is thin enough its actually is the answer to all the
problems if the big old hairy heatsink section could be moved around
for more flexibility. Ive read some reviews where they said it bumps
into the video card on some boards. You can also see the beefy allen
screws used to hold the base onto the board. Possibly another problem
if they are high enough to hit the card and positioned in the wrong
place. They might improve it by drilling into the baseplate and have
the screw head flush with the base plate.


My continuing PC woes.

My horrible lockups and data corruption vastly improved with the RMA
replacement chaintech. However I just had it lockup and freeze again
last night. Strange. This time however as far as I can tell so far its
only with AGENT FORTE news reader. The funny thing though is it worked
fine for a few days with FORTE after I got the board up and running.
When I try to compact data or purge it freezes and lockups requiring a
reboot. I started suspecting memory. Ive been moving my chips around
to the nforce3 board and back to my dual core main system after I got
my replacement board and the last time I moved them around a chip went
bad. Nope tested it for two nights overnight and no errors. Did a scan
disk nope. Im thinking it might be an AGENT thing or something.
Whats kind of interesting is when I tried to put the PCI Express tv
tuner in I bumped the nforce chip cooler but that couldnt have caused
it I dont think though I keep harping on that as a main suspect in
data corruption /freezing problems. After that it started freezing and
locking up but I think thats a coincidence.

Another interesting thing I noticed with the chaintech dual core
system ---- I occaisonally get errors now with Internet Explorer. It
craps out and gives me a error warning. I dont know if its related to
the former problem or if its separate. I did upgrade from the 800XL to
the 7800GT so maybe the nvidia drivers buggy? Or is there a dual core
problem? Im using an AMD dual core driver and some patches forWIN XP
for dual core which is another change from my older setup which didnt
have this problem. Or maybe one of the WIN Updates which was installed
since then is buggy.


Well my nforce3 AMD 3200 system Ive mainly been using while my dual
core chaintech system was RMAd ---- Ive used it for the past month was
OK. It started locking up and acting funny right when I got chaintech
and bizarrely right after I got my chaintech system up it no longer
boots up so I have to check that one out. Seems to be some data
corruption problem says a WIN file is missing or corrupt and refuses
to boot up. I can see the HD data though when I boot up with an old
HD. One freaking problem after another with data corruption. Main
change to it is I transferred my older 3200 2x512 meg mem sticks back
to the chaintech and am using a NEW Kingston 3200 value ram stick I
bought in it. Could that be the problem? I dont know. Right after
putting it in its been like that. So I have to get it up and check the
memory. Maybe its not compatible. Ive posted Ive had lots of problems
with the new value ram and other cheapo ram put out since last year
and that my old value ram and other cheapo sticks seem to be a lot
better in terms of compatibility.

Who needs hobbies when you can spend all your time fixing your PCs
nowadays?
 
K

kony

My horrible lockups and data corruption vastly improved with the RMA
replacement chaintech. However I just had it lockup and freeze again
last night. Strange. This time however as far as I can tell so far its
only with AGENT FORTE news reader. The funny thing though is it worked
fine for a few days with FORTE after I got the board up and running.

Don't know, I'm using a much older version of Forte but it
hasn't done anything like that... are you clearing out old
messages after awhile? It seems mine has been able to hold
a few thousand per box but I don't have any idea what the
max it's had was. Naturally there is some troubleshooting
you can do like backing up your current instance of Agent
and making a testbed install of it.


When I try to compact data or purge it freezes and lockups requiring a
reboot.

I always have it set to Auto, it does that when it
(closes?). Something odd though if you need to reboot
WinXP, or did you mean you only need to reboot to use Agent
again, that the rest of the system still works fine?
I started suspecting memory. Ive been moving my chips around
to the nforce3 board and back to my dual core main system after I got
my replacement board and the last time I moved them around a chip went
bad. Nope tested it for two nights overnight and no errors.

I find memtest86+ valuable in finding errors but not the
last word... I'll also overclock the memory bus past the
speed I expect to use by 5% and retest... it has to pass by
that margin on anything but a gaming-only system and even on
a gaming box if I knew it had very little margin I'd reduce
the speed and/or timings.
Did a scan
disk nope. Im thinking it might be an AGENT thing or something.
Whats kind of interesting is when I tried to put the PCI Express tv
tuner in I bumped the nforce chip cooler but that couldnt have caused
it I dont think though I keep harping on that as a main suspect in
data corruption /freezing problems. After that it started freezing and
locking up but I think thats a coincidence.

Don't know, are you using heatsink grease? That'll
typically tolerate some jarring of the sink but the original
thermal material may not, but since it melts on (usually) if
the sink were loose enough to move it could be a sign of bad
thermal contact.

Another interesting thing I noticed with the chaintech dual core
system ---- I occaisonally get errors now with Internet Explorer. It
craps out and gives me a error warning.

Who doesn't? I don't very often but it seems related to
badly written websites' errors, as using sites that had
never crashed IE, don't ever either. Look into what the
sites are using, try to isolate that. Maybe a browser
pluging, I'd had versions of Acrobat that were buggy but now
I have it set to open windows external to IE, I find I like
the extra real-estate in Acrobat more than the
(convenience?) opening in the same IE window.
I dont know if its related to
the former problem or if its separate. I did upgrade from the 800XL to
the 7800GT so maybe the nvidia drivers buggy?

Don't know, I don't have a 7800GT but the majority of my
cards are nVidia's and I don't recall any problem related to
their drivers, though I tend to use either the 7x.xx series
or the 2nd newest driver at the time (letting those who want
to, be beta-testers for whatever is the current driver...
even though the current driver is usually fine. I guess I
just don't have my hopes up for every newer driver to offer
some single-digit framerate benefit like some gamers do.
Or is there a dual core
problem? Im using an AMD dual core driver and some patches forWIN XP
for dual core which is another change from my older setup which didnt
have this problem. Or maybe one of the WIN Updates which was installed
since then is buggy.

LOL. At this point you are questioning everything, which is
good, but also daunting. You have to isolate some
variables, maybe set aside a HDD partition and do a fresh
windows install and then not let it update itself.


Well my nforce3 AMD 3200 system Ive mainly been using while my dual
core chaintech system was RMAd ---- Ive used it for the past month was
OK. It started locking up and acting funny right when I got chaintech
and bizarrely right after I got my chaintech system up it no longer
boots up so I have to check that one out. Seems to be some data
corruption problem says a WIN file is missing or corrupt and refuses
to boot up. I can see the HD data though when I boot up with an old
HD. One freaking problem after another with data corruption. Main
change to it is I transferred my older 3200 2x512 meg mem sticks back
to the chaintech and am using a NEW Kingston 3200 value ram stick I
bought in it. Could that be the problem? I dont know.

Me either... I'm getting to the point where I'm not anxious
to upgrade much these days, just get a system tweaked
perfectly and use it for awhile. Lots of changes going on
right now and it seems they'll be good in the long run but
in the short term, making full system backups is very
important... but personally, I still like Win2k more than
WinXP so...
Right after
putting it in its been like that. So I have to get it up and check the
memory. Maybe its not compatible. Ive posted Ive had lots of problems
with the new value ram and other cheapo ram put out since last year
and that my old value ram and other cheapo sticks seem to be a lot
better in terms of compatibility.

Maybe, I suppose I'm too conservative though, right now the
system I'm typing on has 1.5GB of OCZ Gold or Platinum
something-or-other in it, rated for 2,2,2,5 and I'm running
it at 2,6,6,10, and not caring much if I'm loosing 2% as a
result, but when it comes to unresolved
(untraceable/unexpected) crashes, I can't recall the last
one. This is actually the longest I've ever gone between
main-use system upgrades, my gaming box is faster and it
usually is turned off.
Who needs hobbies when you can spend all your time fixing your PCs
nowadays?

Well you could just do without SATA if the drives keep
getting corrupted. I wouldn't like that solution either but
it beats losing data... or just put it all on a fully burned
in central server and run little but windows on your main
system.
 
T

Timothy Daniels

My horrible lockups and data corruption vastly improved with the RMA
replacement chaintech. However I just had it lockup and freeze again
last night. Strange. This time however as far as I can tell so far its
only with AGENT FORTE news reader. The funny thing though is it
worked fine for a few days with FORTE after I got the board up and
running. When I try to compact data or purge it freezes and lockups
requiring a reboot. I started suspecting memory. Ive been moving
my chips around to the nforce3 board and back to my dual core
main system after I got my replacement board and the last time I
moved them around a chip went bad. Nope tested it for two nights
overnight and no errors. Did a scan disk nope. Im thinking it might
be an AGENT thing or something.


It could be as simple as an IDE cable with a bad connector.
Behavior would change everytime you moved anything inside
the PC case. Have you tried replacing *all* the IDE cables?

Have you tried a defrag or large file transfer or cloning
operation to stress the I/O and memory? Involvement with
Agent may be just coincidental.

*TimDaniels*
 
T

Timothy Daniels

korny said:
Something odd though if you need to reboot
WinXP, or did you mean you only need to reboot to use Agent
again, that the rest of the system still works fine?


Criminiy! He wrote:
"However I just had it lockup and freeze again
last night. Strange. This time however as far as I can tell so far its
only with AGENT FORTE news reader."

What do *you* think "lockup and freeze" means?
You're so busy spewing, don't you read?

*TimDaniels*
 
K

kony

Criminiy! He wrote:
"However I just had it lockup and freeze again
last night. Strange. This time however as far as I can tell so far its
only with AGENT FORTE news reader."

What do *you* think "lockup and freeze" means?
You're so busy spewing, don't you read?


Thanks for Trolling by Tim.
"IT" could be Agent, or it could be entire system. Probably
entire system but clarification never hurts.
 
K

kony

It could be as simple as an IDE cable with a bad connector.

NO it could not. If the data isn't being sent properly, the
CRC doesn't get validated and the data doesnt' touch the
platters at all... no corruption.

Behavior would change everytime you moved anything inside
the PC case. Have you tried replacing *all* the IDE cables?

Have you tried a defrag or large file transfer or cloning
operation to stress the I/O and memory? Involvement with
Agent may be just coincidental.

yes it could just be coincidental except if it's the only
thing consistently causing a problem while other activities
are continually working fine, it would suggest a subsystem
Agent uses that the others don't, if not Agent itself.
 
T

Timothy Daniels

"korny" butted in:
NO it could not. If the data isn't being sent properly, the
CRC doesn't get validated and the data doesnt' touch the
platters at all... no corruption.


Why not let the OP answer instead of butting in?
He wrote: "When I try to compact data or purge it freezes and
lockups requiring a reboot." It sounds *just like* data not getting
through to "touch the platters" or maybe not "getting off the platters",
i.e. an intermittent IDE connection.

yes it could just be coincidental except if it's the only
thing consistently causing a problem while other activities
are continually working fine, it would suggest a subsystem
Agent uses that the others don't, if not Agent itself.


Please tell us for the record, what "subsystem" does Agent
use that other software doesn't use?

*TimDaniels*
 
Top