New CWShredder update available

  • Thread starter Thread starter LuckyStrike
  • Start date Start date
L

LuckyStrike

latest version is 1.50 available through this alternate link:
http://aumha.org/a/parasite.php

Scroll down to the very bottom of the page and listed as item #3 access the
CWShredder .zip file for version 1.5 from the *Alternate link*, as the
Merijn download site is still DD0S'ed. The Major Geeks site for CWShredder
still has the ~ 1 week old version 1.49 as it's download, so don't bother.
 
To clarify the air regarding this link that I offered for CWShredder update
to version 1.5. Perhaps one would do best to follow this up in an orderly
manner.

Windows Support Center
James A. Eshelman, Proprietor & Webmaster
http://www.aumha.org/
http://www.aumha.org/support.htm
http://www.aumha.org/a/noads.htm
No www. is required for the link I initially offered for CWShredder at the
bottom of this page.
http://aumha.org/a/parasite.php
http://www.aumha.org/a/parasite.htm

This website is about getting help solving computer problems and getting
support for Microsoft products using the Microsoft Communities, or the NNTP
equivalent, newsgroups.
http://www.dts-l.org/
http://www.dts-l.org/gallery.htm
Jim Eshelmans original link :
http://free.freespeech.org/Khephra/
now redirects to:
http://www.aumha.org/

So we have come full circle. I hope this will clarify matters as it appears
that some of you may have been put off by the name of the URL that was
offered. If you're not satisfied with this, I'm sorry, but it's the best I
could do to allay your concerns. If this ha s done nothing to assuage your
worries, *don't* install the update then. Suit yourselves and you be the
judge. ;-)
 
Some day, I may begin to click your URLs again, LS, considering they
come from a "Proprietor & Webmaster" all of a sudden.

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR
(e-mail address removed)
"LuckyStrike" <[email protected]>
wrote in message | To clarify the air regarding this link that I offered for CWShredder
update
| to version 1.5. Perhaps one would do best to follow this up in an
orderly
| manner.
|
| Windows Support Center
| James A. Eshelman, Proprietor & Webmaster
| http://www.aumha.org/
| http://www.aumha.org/support.htm
| http://www.aumha.org/a/noads.htm
| No www. is required for the link I initially offered for CWShredder at
the
| bottom of this page.
| http://aumha.org/a/parasite.php
| http://www.aumha.org/a/parasite.htm
|
| This website is about getting help solving computer problems and
getting
| support for Microsoft products using the Microsoft Communities, or the
NNTP
| equivalent, newsgroups.
| http://www.dts-l.org/
| http://www.dts-l.org/gallery.htm
| Jim Eshelmans original link :
| http://free.freespeech.org/Khephra/
| now redirects to:
| http://www.aumha.org/
|
| So we have come full circle. I hope this will clarify matters as it
appears
| that some of you may have been put off by the name of the URL that was
| offered. If you're not satisfied with this, I'm sorry, but it's the
best I
| could do to allay your concerns. If this ha s done nothing to assuage
your
| worries, *don't* install the update then. Suit yourselves and you be
the
| judge. ;-)
| --
| LuckyStrike
| (e-mail address removed)
| --------------------------------------------------------------------
| --
| LuckyStrike
| (e-mail address removed)
| --------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| "LuckyStrike" <[email protected]>
wrote in
| message | > latest version is 1.50 available through this alternate link:
| > http://aumha.org/a/parasite.php
| >
| > Scroll down to the very bottom of the page and listed as item #3
access
| the
| > CWShredder .zip file for version 1.5 from the *Alternate link*, as
the
| > Merijn download site is still DD0S'ed. The Major Geeks site for
CWShredder
| > still has the ~ 1 week old version 1.49 as it's download, so don't
bother.
| > --
| >
| > LuckyStrike
| > (e-mail address removed)
| > --------------------------------------------------------------------
| >
| >
|
|
 
First Svyatoslav, the person to whom you've just replied to is
LuckyStrike...*not* Jim (Eshelman). It is I, LuckyStrike, whom you falsely
accused and "jumped the gun and my frame" for spreading viruses. Again, a
total and complete falsehood.

I will not at this point digress into the rationale which you have brought
to bear as an excuse for the response you've initially made to me,
*LuckyStrike*.

Not to be overly aggressive here, but I am led to wonder if you ever read a
post -or at least my posts- closely enough to be accurate. I have added
numerous NG's (again) so as to make the readers of those various groups
aware of this reply, and my reply to you, inasmuch as it is only fitting
that my initial post regarding this matter was cross-posted in the interest
of the well-being of all concerned.

I am still dissatisfied, and do not feel that *I, LuckyStrike*, have
received the apology that is due from you as yet.
--

LuckyStrike
(e-mail address removed)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
S. Pidgorny said:
Jim,

No offence intended - your announcment just appears suspiciously similar to
some of the scams that I have received in past. And I wasn't familiar with
your site until now. Sorry, mate.

regards

Slavko

message news:efZ7YT8#[email protected]...
 
Good thing dev/null are monosyllabic, as you evidently (Oh is that too many
syllables for you??) cannot write a post any better than you can read one. I
too shall redurect (Sic)... to the wastebasket of the nearest elementary
school *your* (name withheld to avoid sickness of stomach) worthless output.

*Plonk*
 
I've made my point. Anyone that's worth a grain of salt will be able to
discern the difference and distill the truth and facts. What I've received
*three* times from it's very inception is pure unadulterated tripe and B.S.
from an unworthy sub-standard MVP that shames the very appellation itself.
 
To the "person" that calls himself an MVP:

Your Insensitive non-reply so incensed me that I overlooked three of the
most important facets to be examined here. As you've threatened, you can now
throw this to your /dev/null Void...You've avoided the truth and facts
successfully so far, why stop now?

1) You've indicated by your responses the sad fact that you are unable to
ascertain fact from fiction. A security threat, from a genuine source by
which one may supplement and fortify their security. I would no sooner trust
you or your opinion on security than I would trust former President Bill
Clinton to not have had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky when he
claimed he hadn't.

2) As a human being you represent the worst of what humanity can offer, in
that your ego far outweighs your ability to face facts and truth. *Your
inability to admit when you are wrong*, and your adamant refusal to admit
your fallibility even at this point indicates a serious problem, making you
an unreliable person inasmuch as the only thing of concern to you *is* you,
and how you perceive yourself.

3) You haven't the *slightest* bit of concern for others, as is proven by
the fact that you have made a false accusation against another person which
was undeserved, inaccurate, slanderous, insensitive, and plain wrong. Not
only that, but you continue to do so by virtue (an oxymoron in your case) of
ignoring the fact that the link that I offered was valid, the update was
valid, and you still refuse to recognize that *fact*. I tried to help
others, not hurt them. What had you accomplished in your false accusation?
You "scared" people, you denied them the ability to update and secure their
machines. You didn't really hurt me for I am far above your ilk. But you
hurt humanity as a whole by your crass low behavior, lack of civility, and
by being an archetype of the worst that society can offer. I can only pity
anyone whom you may claim to care for, including persons who may seek advice
that you answer to. You really went out of your way to study what I posted
and to validate your claim didn't you? With you, the act of caring would be
an impossibility. You've proven my point continually, by your slow replies
that have nowhere matched the speed with which you jumped to make a false,
smart alecky diagnosis. So very clever and witty! When a reply was finally
made, it had the same tenor as your first post. This speaks volumes in and
of itself.

*All* of this could have been avoided if you were human enough, big enough,
to admit when you were /are wrong. But that is a quality that you lack,
along with the inability to recognize a security software update from a
virus. I am not about to take nonsense of the kind that you offer lying
down. Maybe you can convince the people you "care" for to let you walk all
over them, but you wont get away with that BS with me.

And you may jettison this to your /dev/null Void so as to continue to try
and avoid truth and reality for all I care. The fact remains: reality is
there whether or not you want to face it or believe it, and your ignoring it
will not change that reality one iota. Avoid it all you like, it doesn't
change that fact that this post can be, and will be read by others. They may
then form their own opinion, and decide whether you are competent, or worthy
to carry the banner of an MVP, or whether I was posting a virus as you
claimed. The truth will out.
 
Here I go again, and I'm sorry but I can't sit by and let a
misunderstanding blow out of proportion.... Lucky can I just nicely
point out that your post appeared to me a bit confusing [and maybe
that's just me]. I knew you weren't Jim because I've seen Jim's posts
but I had to take a second look and I caught myself going... no Lucky
isn't Jim, he's just pointing to Jim's site.

Slav is not substandard. You would find you have WAY more in common
than you have not in common.

You are both cool.
 
Yes Susan, you may, and I'll grant you that. Perhaps confusing initially,
but there are Headers, and the ability to use "find". It would take but a
moments investigation, and enough care to look. This however, is not likely
accomplished by one who prefers to use a "rapid-fire" approach.

As for the latter part of your post - I'll say perhaps, but I'm not yet
certain of that - any further judgment from my side is pending. Thus far,
disappointment would be an understatement of the highest order.

Nevertheless, I fully accept and welcome you, your comments, input and
opinion. Now, and at any time. I still have faith enough and regard for you
to click your link, which I just did. I've seen the content previously
elsewhere, but it still remains useful and sound. Thank you Susan.

Best Regards,
 
Oh, gosh, he plonked you? So? I've been plonked by Terhune. That's even
WORSE, because Terhune can be spelled. There's no way you ever will
remember how to spell Svyatoslav Pidgorny! I do get to rhyme Terhune
with "loon", though.

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR
(e-mail address removed)
"LuckyStrike" <[email protected]>
wrote in message | To the "person" that calls himself an MVP:
|
| Your Insensitive non-reply so incensed me that I overlooked three of
the
| most important facets to be examined here. As you've threatened, you
can now
| throw this to your /dev/null Void...You've avoided the truth and facts
| successfully so far, why stop now?
|
| 1) You've indicated by your responses the sad fact that you are unable
to
| ascertain fact from fiction. A security threat, from a genuine source
by
| which one may supplement and fortify their security. I would no sooner
trust
| you or your opinion on security than I would trust former President
Bill
| Clinton to not have had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky when he
| claimed he hadn't.
|
| 2) As a human being you represent the worst of what humanity can
offer, in
| that your ego far outweighs your ability to face facts and truth.
*Your
| inability to admit when you are wrong*, and your adamant refusal to
admit
| your fallibility even at this point indicates a serious problem,
making you
| an unreliable person inasmuch as the only thing of concern to you *is*
you,
| and how you perceive yourself.
|
| 3) You haven't the *slightest* bit of concern for others, as is proven
by
| the fact that you have made a false accusation against another person
which
| was undeserved, inaccurate, slanderous, insensitive, and plain wrong.
Not
| only that, but you continue to do so by virtue (an oxymoron in your
case) of
| ignoring the fact that the link that I offered was valid, the update
was
| valid, and you still refuse to recognize that *fact*. I tried to help
| others, not hurt them. What had you accomplished in your false
accusation?
| You "scared" people, you denied them the ability to update and secure
their
| machines. You didn't really hurt me for I am far above your ilk. But
you
| hurt humanity as a whole by your crass low behavior, lack of civility,
and
| by being an archetype of the worst that society can offer. I can only
pity
| anyone whom you may claim to care for, including persons who may seek
advice
| that you answer to. You really went out of your way to study what I
posted
| and to validate your claim didn't you? With you, the act of caring
would be
| an impossibility. You've proven my point continually, by your slow
replies
| that have nowhere matched the speed with which you jumped to make a
false,
| smart alecky diagnosis. So very clever and witty! When a reply was
finally
| made, it had the same tenor as your first post. This speaks volumes in
and
| of itself.
|
| *All* of this could have been avoided if you were human enough, big
enough,
| to admit when you were /are wrong. But that is a quality that you
lack,
| along with the inability to recognize a security software update from
a
| virus. I am not about to take nonsense of the kind that you offer
lying
| down. Maybe you can convince the people you "care" for to let you walk
all
| over them, but you wont get away with that BS with me.
|
| And you may jettison this to your /dev/null Void so as to continue to
try
| and avoid truth and reality for all I care. The fact remains: reality
is
| there whether or not you want to face it or believe it, and your
ignoring it
| will not change that reality one iota. Avoid it all you like, it
doesn't
| change that fact that this post can be, and will be read by others.
They may
| then form their own opinion, and decide whether you are competent, or
worthy
| to carry the banner of an MVP, or whether I was posting a virus as you
| claimed. The truth will out.
|
| --
| LuckyStrike
| (e-mail address removed)
| --------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
| | > To whom it may concern: from now on, *I, Svyatoslav Pidgorny* will
| redurect
| > LuckyStrike's posts to /dev/null.
| >
| > Over.
| >
| >
|
| | > To whom it may concern: from now on, *I, Svyatoslav Pidgorny* will
| redurect
| > LuckyStrike's posts to /dev/null.
| >
| > Over.
| >
| >
|
|
 
We are not sure that the original post had anything to do with the subject.

--
George (Bindar Dundat ©) MS-MVP

For Windows Troubleshooting Tips see;
http://aumha.org/win4/a/tshoot.htm

| How lon has it been since this thread had anything to do with the subject?
|
| PCR wrote:
| > Oh, gosh, he plonked you? So? I've been plonked by Terhune. That's even
| > WORSE, because Terhune can be spelled. There's no way you ever will
| > remember how to spell Svyatoslav Pidgorny! I do get to rhyme Terhune
| > with "loon", though.
| >
 
Subjects go in & out of style, Airman Basic. Wait here long enough, &
whatever the topic, it will be all the rage all over again!

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR
(e-mail address removed)
message | How lon has it been since this thread had anything to do with the
subject?
|
| PCR wrote:
| > Oh, gosh, he plonked you? So? I've been plonked by Terhune. That's
even
| > WORSE, because Terhune can be spelled. There's no way you ever will
| > remember how to spell Svyatoslav Pidgorny! I do get to rhyme Terhune
| > with "loon", though.
| >
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top