C
Celegans
How is it being unreasonable to expect Windows Explorer in Vista Ultimate to
search as well as Windows Explorer in Windows 95?
An example: I was looking for some old Delphi code examples for how to work
with the clipboard programmatically.
I searched my old directory of Delphi code fragments (*.pas files) for the
string "clipboard". Windows Explorer in Vista Ultimate search returns ZERO
hits.
Searching the same directory and files over a virtual network using Windows
Explorer for Windows 2000 returns 26 hits. These 26 hits are likely a good
starting place in figuring out the code I now need to write. With Vista I'm
still scratching my head.
When will Microsoft listen and fix the flaw in Vista's search? I have been
looking for a Windows Vista search solution since July 2007. Microsoft
refused to fix the flawed Vista search Vista SP1.
A request for help via an MSDN "Technical Support Incident" goes nowhere
since Microsoft has no current solution.
Microsoft refuses to permit downgrades from Vista Ultimate to Windows XP Pro
to get a search that still works. A Microsoft operator at 425-882-8080 gave
me the E-mail address of Rich Kaplan for dispute resolution when I was
denied permission to downgrade from Vista Ultimate to XP Pro. Even an
appeal to the Microsoft's VP Rich Kaplan ([email protected]), North
America Customer Service Escalation Team, fell on deaf ears. Microsoft
simply doesn't care about search problems in Vista.
Microsoft's "Advanced search techniques" blog gives a number of examples of
the failures of Vista's search, but no solution from Microsoft:
http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2007/05/09/advanced-search-techniques.aspx.
Apparently, new postings showing additional failures of Vista's search on
this blog are no longer welcome.
Microsoft Vista search: "not good enough for programmers, scientists, or
engineers."
From National Instruments:
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/5604#toc4
"A critical aspect of any scientific and engineering application is saving
data to disk. The most well-conceived applications are ineffective if you
cannot quickly locate and interpret acquired data later for meaningful
information. . . . The new Windows Vista operating system provides vastly
improved search tools to help you locate and organize such files; however,
engineers and scientists often have additional needs with regard to
accessing stored data that Windows Vista search may not be able to satisfy."
Why would any person, corporation or government group buy Vista if old
files - or even new files -- cannot be found via Vista's search now? While
Vista's new search is fast, it doesn't search all the files. Microsoft
decides which of your files you don't get to find. My guess is I cannot
find 15-20% of my old files, or even new ones I create, using Vista's
search.
What does it take to get Microsoft to listen and fix this problem?
C.E.
search as well as Windows Explorer in Windows 95?
An example: I was looking for some old Delphi code examples for how to work
with the clipboard programmatically.
I searched my old directory of Delphi code fragments (*.pas files) for the
string "clipboard". Windows Explorer in Vista Ultimate search returns ZERO
hits.
Searching the same directory and files over a virtual network using Windows
Explorer for Windows 2000 returns 26 hits. These 26 hits are likely a good
starting place in figuring out the code I now need to write. With Vista I'm
still scratching my head.
When will Microsoft listen and fix the flaw in Vista's search? I have been
looking for a Windows Vista search solution since July 2007. Microsoft
refused to fix the flawed Vista search Vista SP1.
A request for help via an MSDN "Technical Support Incident" goes nowhere
since Microsoft has no current solution.
Microsoft refuses to permit downgrades from Vista Ultimate to Windows XP Pro
to get a search that still works. A Microsoft operator at 425-882-8080 gave
me the E-mail address of Rich Kaplan for dispute resolution when I was
denied permission to downgrade from Vista Ultimate to XP Pro. Even an
appeal to the Microsoft's VP Rich Kaplan ([email protected]), North
America Customer Service Escalation Team, fell on deaf ears. Microsoft
simply doesn't care about search problems in Vista.
Microsoft's "Advanced search techniques" blog gives a number of examples of
the failures of Vista's search, but no solution from Microsoft:
http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2007/05/09/advanced-search-techniques.aspx.
Apparently, new postings showing additional failures of Vista's search on
this blog are no longer welcome.
Microsoft Vista search: "not good enough for programmers, scientists, or
engineers."
From National Instruments:
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/5604#toc4
"A critical aspect of any scientific and engineering application is saving
data to disk. The most well-conceived applications are ineffective if you
cannot quickly locate and interpret acquired data later for meaningful
information. . . . The new Windows Vista operating system provides vastly
improved search tools to help you locate and organize such files; however,
engineers and scientists often have additional needs with regard to
accessing stored data that Windows Vista search may not be able to satisfy."
Why would any person, corporation or government group buy Vista if old
files - or even new files -- cannot be found via Vista's search now? While
Vista's new search is fast, it doesn't search all the files. Microsoft
decides which of your files you don't get to find. My guess is I cannot
find 15-20% of my old files, or even new ones I create, using Vista's
search.
What does it take to get Microsoft to listen and fix this problem?
C.E.