P
Patrick C
I'm an old retired mainframe field engineer from the days when a
multiprocessor system with 6 megs of ram was a big machine. I notice on my
laptop with 1 gig ram is using almost 80% of it's memory with hardly
anything running. Here's a list I manually jotted down from the performance
memory section in control panel.
Commit KB Private KB
svchost.exe 56,812 47,954
(Local System...
Sidebar.exe 58,800 32,588
TeaTimer.exe 35,588 30,892
svchost.exe 35,668 24,556
(netsvc)
QPService.exe 31,012 21,036
svchost.exe 33,328 19,176
(secsvc)
dwm.exe 55,556 18,000
svchost.exe 20,748 10,748
(NetworkSvc...
mmc.exe 19,404 8,956
And so the list continues with lowering task memory users.
Seems the most hogs are svchost, Sidebar, and TeaTimer. I think I can
cutback on Sidebar. I'm not sure where TeaTimer is coming from or why we
have so many copies of svchost running. Can anyone shed some light on
these? Your help would be appreciated.
multiprocessor system with 6 megs of ram was a big machine. I notice on my
laptop with 1 gig ram is using almost 80% of it's memory with hardly
anything running. Here's a list I manually jotted down from the performance
memory section in control panel.
Commit KB Private KB
svchost.exe 56,812 47,954
(Local System...
Sidebar.exe 58,800 32,588
TeaTimer.exe 35,588 30,892
svchost.exe 35,668 24,556
(netsvc)
QPService.exe 31,012 21,036
svchost.exe 33,328 19,176
(secsvc)
dwm.exe 55,556 18,000
svchost.exe 20,748 10,748
(NetworkSvc...
mmc.exe 19,404 8,956
And so the list continues with lowering task memory users.
Seems the most hogs are svchost, Sidebar, and TeaTimer. I think I can
cutback on Sidebar. I'm not sure where TeaTimer is coming from or why we
have so many copies of svchost running. Can anyone shed some light on
these? Your help would be appreciated.