C
Canceled message
...........Send full headers to: (e-mail address removed)
Or just delete their posts.
Or just delete their posts.
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
S
Sanford Aranoff
Martha Stewart was convicted in part due to email that she sent that the
government recovered, in spite of her deleting the email. My program,
EmailDatabase, stores the email in an encrypted database. Delete a
record and the email cannot be recovered. This security feature is a
strong reason for using my program.
The program can be found on my website: www.analysis-knowledge.com
government recovered, in spite of her deleting the email. My program,
EmailDatabase, stores the email in an encrypted database. Delete a
record and the email cannot be recovered. This security feature is a
strong reason for using my program.
The program can be found on my website: www.analysis-knowledge.com
J
Josef Stalin
"Sanford Arannoff" > Martha Stewart was convicted in part due to email that
she sent that the
And what does this have to do with W2K?
she sent that the
government recovered, in spite of her deleting the database. My program,
EmailDatabaser, stores the database in an encrypted email. Delete a
record and the database cannot be recovered. This security feature is a
strong reason for not using my program.
The program can be found on my website: www.DUMPBUSH.com>
And what does this have to do with W2K?
D
David H. Lipman
Nothing ! -- He's just a lame NJ Comcast spammer !
Send full headers to: (e-mail address removed)
Dave
Send full headers to: (e-mail address removed)
Dave
D
David H. Lipman
You mean -- *AND* delete their posts.
Dave
|
| ..........Send full headers to: (e-mail address removed)
|
| Or just delete their posts.
Dave
|
| ..........Send full headers to: (e-mail address removed)
|
| Or just delete their posts.
B
Bob I
Stupid SPAMMER
S
S
G
George Hester
I'm pretty sure I heard her say, "Damn that EmailDatabase."
J
Jack Nichols
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury. Martha Stewart is not guilty. You
have heard the evidence, there is no need to rehash. But let us assume
that she is guilty. What is the very worst that she has done?
Prosecutor James Comey said that this case is about lying to
investigators and to investors. Prosecutor James Comey is absolutely
right. If this government protected investors, Martha Stewart would be
free to protect their interests.
Martha Stewart was not truthful to investigators because they falsely
claimed that she was guilty of securities fraud. Having acted like it
was a crime to receive a casual stock tip, Martha Stewart lied because
pompous Prosecutors who feed off the generosity of the Federal
Government, were threatening to destroy her life. Ms. Stewart is not a
fool. A stockbroker in her earlier life, Martha Stewart clearly
understood the rules against insider trading, so when her stockbroker
called with a "great tip" she knew that it was possible to allege that
she was committing securities fraud by engaging in illegal insider
trading and she naturally lied to avoid the perception, and that is
not a conspiracy.
If your broker at Merrill Lynch called you and told you that insiders
in a stock you owned were trying to sell their shares, what would you
do? Would you be guilty of committing securities fraud if you sold
your shares? That is what the government would like to suggest and
under these circumstances, I would advise you to do whatever it takes,
to protect yourself from the conspiratorial rants that improperly
threaten your life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Now I know that you people have absolutely no idea who Martha Stewart
is. You have absolutely no idea what it takes to be married to a
billion dollar empire full of jobs and taxable income. You have no
idea that when Martha Stewart rejects the conspiratorial rants of the
Federal Government, her misdemeanor is about as significant as lying
about sex. That is what Martha Stewart essentially did, and if any of
you think that you would advise your children to plead guilty to
committing securities fraud when they are innocent, then Martha
Stewart's lies are criminally material. We live in a world where
perception is called reality, and who can blame Martha Stewart for
lying about the perception, to avoid the opportunity to promote a
false reality? Make no mistake about it, that is exactly what Martha
Stewart did, and everybody knows it.
Martha Stewart is not being charged with insider trading because she
is not guilty. She is being charged with "obstruction of justice" and
"conspiracy" because she refused to corroborate the fantasies of the
Federal Government. As the head of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia
Martha Stewart does not even have time for her own family, let alone
the bizarre, preposterous suggestion that she engaged a conspiracy to
pocket a nickel.
Clearly, when law enforcement falsely claimed that Martha Stewart was
guilty of fraudulent, insider training, Martha Stewart was induced to
lie, and that is called entrapment. That is illegal, and if Martha
Stewart is guilty for refusing to cooperate with corrupt Prosecutors,
then we need to re-write the law. In the meantime, Martha Stewart has
not engaged in any behavior that can even remotely be called a
criminal offense.
The Wall Street Journal is the sternest of critics when it comes to
the world of business, and to quote directly:
"With regard to the now-dismissed securities fraud charge, it's worth
noting that ever since the feds intervened to "protect" Miss Stewart's
shareholders, their stock has been languishing. On the news Friday
that the albatross had been lifted, these holders watched their stock
rise nearly 11%, closing at a level it hadn't seen since June 2002.
Which begs the question: Who hurt the shareholders of Martha Stewart
Living more: Martha, or the prosecuting U.S. Attorney? The market's
already given its answer."
If the Wall street Journal suggests that the prosecuting attorney is
in fact the actual villain, what makes you think that Martha Stewart
is guilty of any criminal conduct? If you want to restore faith in
Wall Street, what makes you think that the Wall Street Journal does
not?
Make no mistake about it, ladies and gentlemen, Martha Stewart is not
guilty, and that is not a matter of my opinion. It is a matter of the
fact that you do not have the capacity to prove otherwise.
A woman who employs thousands and generates taxable profits should be
applauded, not condemned.
Unlike all the crooks who have milked small investors of billions of
dollars and still enjoy their freedom, Martha Stewart did not cook the
books of her company, she did not treat Martha Stewart Living
Omnimedia as her personal piggy bank, she did not run her company into
the ground, she did not lie to shareholders, employees, analysts and
pension fund managers, and she does not deserve to be bullied by
overreaching prosecutors. After all, apples are not oranges, and if
prosecutors do not recognize the difference between ordinary business
dealings and criminal behavior, what makes them think they deserve
anybody's respect?
The Defense rests.
Announce YOUR verdict, here !
http://skakel.tripod.com/martha.htm
have heard the evidence, there is no need to rehash. But let us assume
that she is guilty. What is the very worst that she has done?
Prosecutor James Comey said that this case is about lying to
investigators and to investors. Prosecutor James Comey is absolutely
right. If this government protected investors, Martha Stewart would be
free to protect their interests.
Martha Stewart was not truthful to investigators because they falsely
claimed that she was guilty of securities fraud. Having acted like it
was a crime to receive a casual stock tip, Martha Stewart lied because
pompous Prosecutors who feed off the generosity of the Federal
Government, were threatening to destroy her life. Ms. Stewart is not a
fool. A stockbroker in her earlier life, Martha Stewart clearly
understood the rules against insider trading, so when her stockbroker
called with a "great tip" she knew that it was possible to allege that
she was committing securities fraud by engaging in illegal insider
trading and she naturally lied to avoid the perception, and that is
not a conspiracy.
If your broker at Merrill Lynch called you and told you that insiders
in a stock you owned were trying to sell their shares, what would you
do? Would you be guilty of committing securities fraud if you sold
your shares? That is what the government would like to suggest and
under these circumstances, I would advise you to do whatever it takes,
to protect yourself from the conspiratorial rants that improperly
threaten your life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Now I know that you people have absolutely no idea who Martha Stewart
is. You have absolutely no idea what it takes to be married to a
billion dollar empire full of jobs and taxable income. You have no
idea that when Martha Stewart rejects the conspiratorial rants of the
Federal Government, her misdemeanor is about as significant as lying
about sex. That is what Martha Stewart essentially did, and if any of
you think that you would advise your children to plead guilty to
committing securities fraud when they are innocent, then Martha
Stewart's lies are criminally material. We live in a world where
perception is called reality, and who can blame Martha Stewart for
lying about the perception, to avoid the opportunity to promote a
false reality? Make no mistake about it, that is exactly what Martha
Stewart did, and everybody knows it.
Martha Stewart is not being charged with insider trading because she
is not guilty. She is being charged with "obstruction of justice" and
"conspiracy" because she refused to corroborate the fantasies of the
Federal Government. As the head of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia
Martha Stewart does not even have time for her own family, let alone
the bizarre, preposterous suggestion that she engaged a conspiracy to
pocket a nickel.
Clearly, when law enforcement falsely claimed that Martha Stewart was
guilty of fraudulent, insider training, Martha Stewart was induced to
lie, and that is called entrapment. That is illegal, and if Martha
Stewart is guilty for refusing to cooperate with corrupt Prosecutors,
then we need to re-write the law. In the meantime, Martha Stewart has
not engaged in any behavior that can even remotely be called a
criminal offense.
The Wall Street Journal is the sternest of critics when it comes to
the world of business, and to quote directly:
"With regard to the now-dismissed securities fraud charge, it's worth
noting that ever since the feds intervened to "protect" Miss Stewart's
shareholders, their stock has been languishing. On the news Friday
that the albatross had been lifted, these holders watched their stock
rise nearly 11%, closing at a level it hadn't seen since June 2002.
Which begs the question: Who hurt the shareholders of Martha Stewart
Living more: Martha, or the prosecuting U.S. Attorney? The market's
already given its answer."
If the Wall street Journal suggests that the prosecuting attorney is
in fact the actual villain, what makes you think that Martha Stewart
is guilty of any criminal conduct? If you want to restore faith in
Wall Street, what makes you think that the Wall Street Journal does
not?
Make no mistake about it, ladies and gentlemen, Martha Stewart is not
guilty, and that is not a matter of my opinion. It is a matter of the
fact that you do not have the capacity to prove otherwise.
A woman who employs thousands and generates taxable profits should be
applauded, not condemned.
Unlike all the crooks who have milked small investors of billions of
dollars and still enjoy their freedom, Martha Stewart did not cook the
books of her company, she did not treat Martha Stewart Living
Omnimedia as her personal piggy bank, she did not run her company into
the ground, she did not lie to shareholders, employees, analysts and
pension fund managers, and she does not deserve to be bullied by
overreaching prosecutors. After all, apples are not oranges, and if
prosecutors do not recognize the difference between ordinary business
dealings and criminal behavior, what makes them think they deserve
anybody's respect?
The Defense rests.
Announce YOUR verdict, here !
http://skakel.tripod.com/martha.htm
D
David H. Lipman
Guilty or not --
It is Off Topic for a MS News Group so take is somewher else !
Dave
It is Off Topic for a MS News Group so take is somewher else !
Dave
J
Jack Nichols
David H. Lipman said:Guilty or not --
It is Off Topic for a MS News Group so take is somewher else !
Dave
But Dave, it is your civic duty to serve on the Jury -oh God, I'd hate
to read your comment !
Historic, Internet Jury Poll Comments
_____________________________________
OJ is free, send Martha to Jail. LOL 03/11/04 9:14:57 AM MST
The envy is incredible, isn't it? 03/11/04 7:36:55 AM MST
total injustice 03/11/04 7:26:01 AM MST
The jury is still out. 03/10/04 2:49:50 PM MST
Martha Stewart is just a scapegoat. 03/10/04 1:35:01 PM MST
Prosecutors pandered to populist prejudices! What a country it now is!
03/10/04 11:50:28 AM MST
Another Stalinist, Show Trial ! 03/10/04 10:32:27 AM MST
you are crack pots - and thats a goodthing 03/10/04 9:28:29 AM MST
Not Guilty 03/10/04 6:36:19 AM MST
Free Martha ! 03/09/04 9:37:20 PM MST
What do you think -you get to add your comments after reading the
Closing Argument, and determining Guilt or Innocense. The Internet
jury is still out !
http://skakel.tripod.com/martha.htm
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.