S
Scott092707
I wished to rotate .jpg photos so that in a slideshow people don't have to
crane their necks constantly to view the pictures. I have found that after
rotation, the picture size is reduced by 44 bytes (one example;don't know if
it's consistant with each picture), and that the bytes don't come back if
rotated back to the original orientation. Further 90-degree roation adds or
removes an additional 5 bytes, but no more. Naturally, I want full
resolution when I go to print the photos, in the original orientation, so I
want to know:
1) what causes the loss of the initial 44 bytes;
2) what causes the additional loss/gain of 5 bytes;
and
3) whether those lost 44/5 bytes are unnecessary and I shouldn't worry about
it,
or I should never rotate pictures, or what?
In case the info is necessary, I am using Windows XP-Pro Vers. 2002 SP 2
Actual data: orig. photo 1.823 KB, rotated photo 1.779/1.774 KB
-Scott
crane their necks constantly to view the pictures. I have found that after
rotation, the picture size is reduced by 44 bytes (one example;don't know if
it's consistant with each picture), and that the bytes don't come back if
rotated back to the original orientation. Further 90-degree roation adds or
removes an additional 5 bytes, but no more. Naturally, I want full
resolution when I go to print the photos, in the original orientation, so I
want to know:
1) what causes the loss of the initial 44 bytes;
2) what causes the additional loss/gain of 5 bytes;
and
3) whether those lost 44/5 bytes are unnecessary and I shouldn't worry about
it,
or I should never rotate pictures, or what?
In case the info is necessary, I am using Windows XP-Pro Vers. 2002 SP 2
Actual data: orig. photo 1.823 KB, rotated photo 1.779/1.774 KB
-Scott