J
Jorge
I have 3 DB's
DOG.db, CAT.db, RECV.db
DOG has Food$, Carrier$, Shots$ Primary key = A
CAT has Food$, Carrier$, Shots$ Primary key = B
These 2 db's can only have one entry pertaining to food etc
So would you call these a table? I suppose.
I have the record set to 1.
RECV has Name, Address etc.. and type of transaction (DOG or CAT)
Based on a check mark (on/off) in DOG or CAT it will display the current
fields within either Dog or Cat for Food$, Carrier$, Shots$
Does this sound okay?
|X| | | -------------------------
DOG CAT | Dog Food $5 |
| Dog Carrier $5 |
| Dog Shots $5 |
| |
--------------------------
The dog & cat & Recv databases have quite a few more entries but I am just
trying to keep it simple.
Thank -u
Jorge
DOG.db, CAT.db, RECV.db
DOG has Food$, Carrier$, Shots$ Primary key = A
CAT has Food$, Carrier$, Shots$ Primary key = B
These 2 db's can only have one entry pertaining to food etc
So would you call these a table? I suppose.
I have the record set to 1.
RECV has Name, Address etc.. and type of transaction (DOG or CAT)
Based on a check mark (on/off) in DOG or CAT it will display the current
fields within either Dog or Cat for Food$, Carrier$, Shots$
Does this sound okay?
|X| | | -------------------------
DOG CAT | Dog Food $5 |
| Dog Carrier $5 |
| Dog Shots $5 |
| |
--------------------------
The dog & cat & Recv databases have quite a few more entries but I am just
trying to keep it simple.
Thank -u
Jorge