Living on the bleeding edge - WinXP SP2 RC2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gordon Darling
  • Start date Start date
I read that it'll make XP even more of a resource hog.
Click to expand...
~It doesn't. It also has some very nice security tricks. Lots of hidden
stuff too. Ability to control IE plugins such as toolbar enhancers etc
very nice.
 
Cruising said:
When I installed SP1, my PC became a slug. If this is the "unslugger"
great. If not, screw 'em.
Click to expand...

In all the years that I've used Microsoft Windows, they have *NEVER*
created a newer version that is faster than the previous one, even
though almost every time they claim something like "you'll be able to
do things faster than ever before." It's absolutely not in their
interest to speed things up. Probably because if they slow your
computer down, you'll be more inclined to buy a newer one with more
storage space that will hold more of their bloat. And there are other
reasons that they push hardware upgrades, for instance this new
BIOSless system that they're pushing for.

I.e., don't hold your breath.
 
In all the years that I've used Microsoft Windows, they have *NEVER*
created a newer version that is faster than the previous one, even
though almost every time they claim something like "you'll be able to
do things faster than ever before." It's absolutely not in their
interest to speed things up. Probably because if they slow your
computer down, you'll be more inclined to buy a newer one with more
storage space that will hold more of their bloat. And there are other
reasons that they push hardware upgrades, for instance this new
BIOSless system that they're pushing for.

I.e., don't hold your breath.
Click to expand...

They have pretty much refused to even admit that SP1 has delirious
effects on performance. When I talked to them they said RAM upgrade.

Hell, I already got 1MB.
 
Cruising said:
They have pretty much refused to even admit that SP1 has delirious
effects on performance. When I talked to them they said RAM upgrade.

Hell, I already got 1MB.
Click to expand...

1MB mmmmhhhh ... could be why its slow :)
 
Cruising said:
They have pretty much refused to even admit that SP1 has delirious
effects on performance. When I talked to them they said RAM upgrade.

Hell, I already got 1MB.
Click to expand...

I hope you meant 1 GB.
 
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:15:40 -0700, in alt.comp.freeware, the personage of John
Corliss <[email protected]#>, courtesy of Message-id
and wondering whence the lambs & piglets said:
I hope you meant 1 GB.
Click to expand...

Perhaps an old (circa 1981?) quote from Bill Gates occupied the mental-spaces
at that moment....
 
Vrodok said:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:15:40 -0700, in alt.comp.freeware, the personage of John
Corliss <[email protected]#>, courtesy of Message-id
<[email protected]>, and wondering whence the lambs & piglets,
bleated & squealed:




Perhaps an old (circa 1981?) quote from Bill Gates occupied the mental-spaces
at that moment....
Click to expand...

Heh. That's right. We aren't supposed to need any more than that.
 
I feel obliged to giggle on both counts
Click to expand...
Only speaking as I find. THe default option in OE not to display
external HTML content in e-mails goes a long way as does the ability to
control addons/plugins/enhancements in IE plus the fact that when
something tries to install something in IE, i.e malware toolbar, a
popup window appears asking if you want to allow it.

Still, I guess you found all of that?
 
Only speaking as I find. THe default option in OE not to display
external HTML content in e-mails goes a long way as does the ability to
control addons/plugins/enhancements in IE plus the fact that when
something tries to install something in IE, i.e malware toolbar, a
popup window appears asking if you want to allow it.

Still, I guess you found all of that?
Click to expand...

Google the following;
"Internet Explorer" +vulnerabilities +unpatched +2004

Link will wrap
http://www.google.com/search?q="Int...++2004&sourceid=opera&num=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

5,420 hits

Regards
Gordon
 
The original XP was faster, too fast for some software. MS purposely
slowed XP down to reduce complaints from software vendors. Thought
this was semi-common knowledge.

BoB
 
The original XP was faster, too fast for some software. MS purposely
slowed XP down to reduce complaints from software vendors. Thought
this was semi-common knowledge.
Click to expand...

MSoft put an OS out that was too fast and the software boys/girls
didn't adjust before delivery?

LOL
 
The original XP was faster, too fast for some software. MS purposely
slowed XP down to reduce complaints from software vendors. Thought
this was semi-common knowledge.

BoB
Click to expand...

Is there anywhere (credible) I can read about this? It seems bizarre.

R.
 
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:03:41 -0400, in alt.comp.freeware, the personage of BoB
<[email protected]>, courtesy of Message-id
and wondering whence the lambs & said:
The original XP was faster, too fast for some software. MS purposely
slowed XP down to reduce complaints from software vendors. Thought
this was semi-common knowledge.

BoB
Click to expand...

What did I write? It appears to have been omitted.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

WinXP SP2 RC1 released. 1
XP Ser Pack 2 2
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for May, 2005 2
OpenOffice.org 2.0 4
Problems with Windows Update, v5 2
System File Checker SP2 with XP SP1 CD Prompt 2
SP3 RC2 troubles 5
when is SP2 coming out? 7

Back
Top