ok in what ever format the field is, it needs to be able to do a few tasks.
1) needs to be either a drop down list or at least the user can somehow
select from multiple choices.
2) the choices are checklists which can be hundreds of characters alone
So each choice is *itself* a list of multiple items? Are you storing these
lists of multiple items in a Memo field? To me a checklist suggests a
(related) table with one record per checklist item (text describing the item
and ... tada!... a Checkbox control to check it off).
3) the user needs to be able to then edit the checklist on their record to
state any other information.
Fine. That has absolutely nothing to do with putting a Memo Field into a combo
box. The user wouldn't be able to edit it in a combo box ANYWAY.
basicly there is a dozen different check lists for a seperate jobs, and the
users need to be able to see theie check list and then put in more
information in the check list, as each job is slightly different. To try and
make it easier for the user instead of having a dozen different forms
pointing at different tables for different jobs/check lists i am trying to
put all of them in one form.
I am not suggesting "a dozen different forms"; I agree, that would be a bad
idea. But if you're assuming that the data must all be in one table - or even
more, all in one field - to be presented to the user on one form, your
assumption is incorrect! Forms and subforms are perfectly routine and usable.
It sounds like you may want to consider a table structure with One-Many-Many:
a Jobs table, related one to many to a Checklists table, related one to many
to a ListItems table. You could use a combo box (displaying a descriptive
name, not the entire checklist itself) to choose which checklist (or lists) is
needed for a job. This combo could use a bit of VBA code to run an Append
query to copy the ChecklistItems for that list into a table related to the
Jobs table; the user could then add new checklist items, delete irrelevant
ones, edit others, using a subform showing one checklist item per record.
Would that be practical, or am I misunderstanding the nature of the problem?
John W. Vinson [MVP]