Hello,
There isn't any reason not to install it on Cluster that I am aware of but
not a lot of value in placing it there either.
Since the KMS host machine do not share data, having a second KMS host
elsewhere probably works just as well.
Thanks,
Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
--------------------
|> Thread-Topic: KMS and Windows 2003 Cluster Server
|> thread-index: Acf+tbiBTVSkAuwoQh6u8zsRPRQccQ==
|> X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 134.198.31.25
|> From: =?Utf-8?B?YWxsYWJvdXRtZQ==?= <
[email protected]>
|> Subject: KMS and Windows 2003 Cluster Server
|> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:18:04 -0700
|> Lines: 3
|> Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
|> MIME-Version: 1.0
|> Content-Type: text/plain;
|> charset="Utf-8"
|> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|> X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
|> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
|> Importance: normal
|> Priority: normal
|> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2929
|> Newsgroups:
microsoft.public.windows.vista.administration_accounts_passwords
|> Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl
|> Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.windows.vista.administration_accounts_passwords:5622
|> NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftsbfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.148
|> X-Tomcat-NG:
microsoft.public.windows.vista.administration_accounts_passwords
|>
|> Hi! Is there any reason why I shouln't install the KMS service for
Volume
|> Activation of Vista pc's on our Windows 2003 cluster server? I thought
it
|> would work well for redudency. Thanks!
|>
