R
Richard Steinfeld
Can anyone explain this one?
The program JustZIPit, from Avatar Software, is a very fast zip/unzip
utility. One thing that I like about it is that when unzipping, it first
creates a subdirectory, and then dumps the extracted files there. This
way, it's clear which files are freshly extracted, which would not be
the case if the files were laced throughout the hope of the original
..zip file.
Something that I really don't enjoy, however, is that every time the
program has been run, it places a distinct key in the registry stating
which file it unzipped. This can make for more registry bloat than we'd
like. These keys were displayed in the System Mechanic registry fixer;
they weren't presented in the registry fixer that's part of System Suite
(these are both regular payware). As much as JustZIPit is enjoyable to
use, registry clutter is not fun to have to deal with.
The publisher's web site has been malfunctioning for quite a while, so
it's not possible to go there for answers.
Can anyone provide some insight as to why this should be tolerable behavior?
RichardJ
The program JustZIPit, from Avatar Software, is a very fast zip/unzip
utility. One thing that I like about it is that when unzipping, it first
creates a subdirectory, and then dumps the extracted files there. This
way, it's clear which files are freshly extracted, which would not be
the case if the files were laced throughout the hope of the original
..zip file.
Something that I really don't enjoy, however, is that every time the
program has been run, it places a distinct key in the registry stating
which file it unzipped. This can make for more registry bloat than we'd
like. These keys were displayed in the System Mechanic registry fixer;
they weren't presented in the registry fixer that's part of System Suite
(these are both regular payware). As much as JustZIPit is enjoyable to
use, registry clutter is not fun to have to deal with.
The publisher's web site has been malfunctioning for quite a while, so
it's not possible to go there for answers.
Can anyone provide some insight as to why this should be tolerable behavior?
RichardJ