camaz said:
I've been told that some people partition their primary hard drive so
that the Operating System, the Applications, and actual data files
(documents, images, music, etc.) are installed on separate
partitions, so that the Operating System can be reinstalled at any
time with no effect on the other partitions. Sounds like a great
idea. Anybody know where I can find this procedure detailed?
I very much disagree that it's great idea. I think it's a poor partitioning
scheme and rationale for it.
First of all, note that if your applications are installed on a partition
separate from that the operating system is on, you can *not* reinstall the
operating system without losing the applications. The reason is that all
applications (execpt for a very occasional near-trivial one) have enjtiries
and pointers to them within Windows, in the registry and elsewhere. With
Windows gone, all those ntries get lost, and the applications get broken. So
that benefit goes away.
2. With regard to separating data from the operating system, as far as I'm
concerned, the reason to do that is if your backup scheme backs up data only
(as opposed to imaging the whole drive). Backing up data is easier if you
separate its partition from what you don't want to back up.
Separating data from the operating system so you can reinstall Windows
without affecting the data might be useful if you have no backup for your
data. With a backup, such a rationale goes away, since you can always
restore from your backup if you ever reinstall Windows. So that rationale
sounds to me like a substiture for a backup, and it's a very poor
substitute, since the risk of losing everything on the drive simultaneously
(due to head crashes, severe power glitches, nearby lightning strikes, virus
attacks, even theft of the computer) is always great.
Execpt for those who run multiple operating systems, most people are best
served with either a single partition or two (one for the operating system;
one for data), depending on how they plan to do backups.