Is COM (ATL) dead ?

  • Thread starter Bartholomew Simpson
  • Start date
B

Bartholomew Simpson

New to this whole .net fangled thing. been programming C/C++ for donkeys
though ...

Need to interface legacy C++ code with a VB6 front end and it looks like
I need to write some ATL COM wrappers. Is it worth me learning how to
write ATL COM objects - or is this a dead technology ?
 
N

Number 11950 - GPEMC! Replace number with 11950

Bartholomew Simpson said:
New to this whole .net fangled thing. been programming C/C++ for donkeys
though ...

Need to interface legacy C++ code with a VB6 front end and it looks like
I need to write some ATL COM wrappers. Is it worth me learning how to
write ATL COM objects - or is this a dead technology ?

Not as long as "native" executables compiled by VB2005 contain the MSIL
version of the code that can be so easily decompiled...
 
M

Mr. Arnold

Bartholomew Simpson said:
New to this whole .net fangled thing. been programming C/C++ for donkeys
though ...

Need to interface legacy C++ code with a VB6 front end and it looks like I
need to write some ATL COM wrappers. Is it worth me learning how to write
ATL COM objects - or is this a dead technology ?

It may help you. I always like to pillage and plunder myself.

http://www.codeproject.com/atl/
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top