K
Karen Lea Siegel
Not quite sure this is the right place for the question,
but it is for a long document, so here goes:
I'm working in Word 2000, and I would ideally like to be
able to use a field code switch for the XE (Index Entry)
field called "type." It is listed in Word Help, with a
syntax of \f "type", and the documentation says that using
this syntax to mark an index entry means the entry is only
included in an index inserted by the field {index
\f "type"}.
Tried this. I'm getting the whole index, regardless of
what I've placed in the "type" position in the switch.
What I have (or what I will eventually have) is a bunch of
marked index entries, each marked for a specific scope
statement for the current project, and ideally I'd like to
be able to generate one "mini-index" for each scope
statement. So the "type" switch would contain something
like "ss1", "ss2", and so on. As I said, I tried this, and
got the whole index regardless of switch instructions, and
I'm blessed if I can find any more detailed documentation
of this field switch.
Anybody got a suggestion? (Other than do it all as a
straight single index, which I can also do.)
but it is for a long document, so here goes:
I'm working in Word 2000, and I would ideally like to be
able to use a field code switch for the XE (Index Entry)
field called "type." It is listed in Word Help, with a
syntax of \f "type", and the documentation says that using
this syntax to mark an index entry means the entry is only
included in an index inserted by the field {index
\f "type"}.
Tried this. I'm getting the whole index, regardless of
what I've placed in the "type" position in the switch.
What I have (or what I will eventually have) is a bunch of
marked index entries, each marked for a specific scope
statement for the current project, and ideally I'd like to
be able to generate one "mini-index" for each scope
statement. So the "type" switch would contain something
like "ss1", "ss2", and so on. As I said, I tried this, and
got the whole index regardless of switch instructions, and
I'm blessed if I can find any more detailed documentation
of this field switch.
Anybody got a suggestion? (Other than do it all as a
straight single index, which I can also do.)