I reinstalled Windows XP and cannot locate 30GB disk space

C

CJ

I reinstalled windows XP on my compaq presario notebook computer. I
probably clicked some button to partition C: drive, during the process.
I only used one Windows XP CD, and did not use other manufacturer's
System Recovery CDs.

After the installation, I find my computer only shows 10 GB C drive.
The computer shall have 40 GB disk space in total. I cannot locate the
other 30 GB space.

Please help.
 
R

Rick Rogers

Hi,

Click start/run, type diskmgmt.msc and click ok. What does it tell you about
your drive space allocation?

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP

Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
 
C

***** charles

CJ said:
I reinstalled windows XP on my compaq presario notebook computer. I
probably clicked some button to partition C: drive, during the process.
I only used one Windows XP CD, and did not use other manufacturer's
System Recovery CDs.

After the installation, I find my computer only shows 10 GB C drive.
The computer shall have 40 GB disk space in total. I cannot locate the
other 30 GB space.

Please help.

Have you tried FDISK?

later.....
 
C

CJ

I tried your way. I find 27 GB unallocated, what shall I do now to get
these 27GB to be usable?
 
R

Rick Rogers

Right click the free space and create a new partition. Format it and you're
ready to go.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP

Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
 
T

thanatoid

Right click the free space and create a new partition.
Format it and you're ready to go.

While you're at it I seriously recommend creating 4 or 5
"logical drives" or partitions. If you're into movies and stuff,
make one or two big, and the others smaller. It'll be like
having 5 small filing cabinets instead of one. IOW, a LOT easier
to manage/find stuff.
I have 16 partitions on my 40GB drive and I am VERY happy with
this arrangement.



--
thanatoid-Tip® #24 (a silly joke because I can't come up with
anything)
How does an Englishman know his wife is dead?
The sex is just the same but the dishes are piling up in the
kitchen.
 
H

Harry Ohrn

thanatoid said:
While you're at it I seriously recommend creating 4 or 5
"logical drives" or partitions. If you're into movies and stuff,
make one or two big, and the others smaller. It'll be like
having 5 small filing cabinets instead of one. IOW, a LOT easier
to manage/find stuff.
I have 16 partitions on my 40GB drive and I am VERY happy with
this arrangement.



--
thanatoid-Tip® #24 (a silly joke because I can't come up with
anything)
How does an Englishman know his wife is dead?
The sex is just the same but the dishes are piling up in the
kitchen.

16 partitions on a 40GB drive? That's gotta be a joke right? Seriously
creating multiple partitions is not a good plan for most people. While you
may have specific needs for setting up multiple partitions it is not wise to
encourage others to do the same unless they have specific repartitioning
software like Acronis DiskDirector or BootItNG and you plan to offer them
tech support.
 
H

Harry Ohrn

***** charles said:
Have you tried FDISK?

later.....


No need to use FDISK. The windows XP CD has all the tools you need. Go here
http://www.webtree.ca/windowsxp/repair_xp.htm and look at How To Partition .
Just use the recovery console and Diskpart to remove all the partitions.
Leave the XP CD in the drive and type EXIT. The computer will reboot and the
XP CD will boot. You can then run setup. This time select all the space to
install XP on and you should be fine. See the info here
http://www.webtree.ca/windowsxp/clean_install.htm
 
T

thanatoid

16 partitions on a 40GB drive? That's gotta be a joke
right? Seriously creating multiple partitions is not a good
plan for most people. While you may have specific needs for
setting up multiple partitions it is not wise to encourage
others to do the same unless they have specific
repartitioning software like Acronis DiskDirector or
BootItNG and you plan to offer them tech support.

Of course it's not a joke. Partitions are VERY useful - and I
suspect you know it perfectly well.

I have refrained from making sarcastic comments about MVP's,
because recently there has actually been some decent advice
given out by some of you clan, but if you (in an admittedly
difficult attempt at objectivity) will not admit that partitions
are one of the smartest ways to manage your computer, then I
guess you also think Windows Explorer is a file manager and OE a
newsreader, and believe that as long as someone knows the
difference between a lower case and a capital letter, they need
M$ Office.

There was a great article I ran across just yesterday on how
Microsoft is more then anything making people dumber (like the
mass media isn't enough). But when a "professional" argues
against partitions, one really starts to wonder where the
smart/stupid boundary lies these days. I know "most" people (let
alone new users) are incapable of even cogitating the concept of
logical drives, but the OP did not appear to be one of those, so
I gave him some good advice.

Oh, I forgot... There's NO DOS since Win95, right, so I am
simply imagining everything and the mystical FDISK program and
the logical partitions it can create exist in my sick brain
only, right? So the reason you are recommending 3rd party
software is because the official line is that there are no more
M$ disk tools? And you will not admit that probably 50% of
problems users have would be eliminated or seriously minimized
by use of partitions because...?

(I know nothing about XtraProblems and intend to keep it this
way, BTW, so I have no idea how you partition/format in XP...
But I would guess you're just NOT SUPPOSED TO, right??? Clippy
will manage your machine for you!)

{I DO recall reading somewhere how there is a 1GB DOS emulator
in XP... I have NEVER heard anything more ridiculous in my
life... But feel free to correct me if I am wrong... While
you're at it, since you MVP's know everything, PLEASE tell me
where the Windows Registry in 95 and 98 keeps the desktop icon
placement information... I have been asking for years and is
seems NO ONE knows... And please don't tell me about
"WinTidy"... I am familiar with it, and it is NOT the answer to
my question...}

Of course, only having one partition helps the economy by
providing more work for independent and M$ techs (what is it
now, $30 per call to your masters?), makes hard drive makers
happy, and makes people more miserable when they lose everything
instead of just a part of it, but you M$ guys like it this way,
don't you? I could go on, but it's not worth it...


--
thanatoid-Tip® #24 (a silly joke because I can't come up with
anything)
How does an Englishman know his wife is dead?
The sex is just the same but the dishes are piling up in the
kitchen.
 
B

Barry OGrady

16 partitions on a 40GB drive? That's gotta be a joke right? Seriously
creating multiple partitions is not a good plan for most people. While you
may have specific needs for setting up multiple partitions it is not wise to
encourage others to do the same unless they have specific repartitioning
software like Acronis DiskDirector or BootItNG and you plan to offer them
tech support.

I have one partition on my 160 gig drive. Search comes in handy at times.

Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
 
B

Barry OGrady

Of course it's not a joke. Partitions are VERY useful - and I
suspect you know it perfectly well.

Quite unnecessary.
I have refrained from making sarcastic comments about MVP's,
because recently there has actually been some decent advice
given out by some of you clan, but if you (in an admittedly
difficult attempt at objectivity) will not admit that partitions
are one of the smartest ways to manage your computer, then I
guess you also think Windows Explorer is a file manager and OE a
newsreader, and believe that as long as someone knows the
difference between a lower case and a capital letter, they need
M$ Office.

They would need to know the difference between an S and a $.
There was a great article I ran across just yesterday on how
Microsoft is more then anything making people dumber (like the
mass media isn't enough). But when a "professional" argues
against partitions, one really starts to wonder where the
smart/stupid boundary lies these days. I know "most" people (let
alone new users) are incapable of even cogitating the concept of
logical drives, but the OP did not appear to be one of those, so
I gave him some good advice.

Partitions are not necessary with NTFS.
Oh, I forgot... There's NO DOS since Win95, right, so I am
simply imagining everything and the mystical FDISK program and
the logical partitions it can create exist in my sick brain
only, right? So the reason you are recommending 3rd party
software is because the official line is that there are no more
M$ disk tools?

Never heard of M$.
And you will not admit that probably 50% of
problems users have would be eliminated or seriously minimized
by use of partitions because...?

....its not true.
(I know nothing about XtraProblems and intend to keep it this
way, BTW, so I have no idea how you partition/format in XP...
But I would guess you're just NOT SUPPOSED TO, right??? Clippy
will manage your machine for you!)

NTFS eliminates the need for partitions.
{I DO recall reading somewhere how there is a 1GB DOS emulator
in XP... I have NEVER heard anything more ridiculous in my
life... But feel free to correct me if I am wrong... While
you're at it, since you MVP's know everything, PLEASE tell me
where the Windows Registry in 95 and 98 keeps the desktop icon
placement information... I have been asking for years and is
seems NO ONE knows... And please don't tell me about
"WinTidy"... I am familiar with it, and it is NOT the answer to
my question...}

Of course, only having one partition helps the economy by
providing more work for independent and M$ techs (what is it
now, $30 per call to your masters?), makes hard drive makers
happy, and makes people more miserable when they lose everything
instead of just a part of it, but you M$ guys like it this way,
don't you? I could go on, but it's not worth it...

I think you made up the M$ thing. Prove there is an organisation
called M$.

Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
 
D

DL

40gb / 16 partitions?
Are you still locked in win95 thinking, either you have some very odd files,
or havent learnt anything about organisation / ntfs
Having said that, whatever pleases you is fine, just avoid giving poor
advice on the subject
 
P

Phil Weldon

'thanatoid' wrote:
| While you're at it I seriously recommend creating 4 or 5
| "logical drives" or partitions. If you're into movies and stuff,
| make one or two big, and the others smaller. It'll be like
| having 5 small filing cabinets instead of one. IOW, a LOT easier
| to manage/find stuff.
| I have 16 partitions on my 40GB drive and I am VERY happy with
| this arrangement.
_____

And I'll bet you file in sub-folders labeled A, B, C, D ... and JAN, FEB,
MAR, APR ...

Phil Weldon


| |
| > Right click the free space and create a new partition.
| > Format it and you're ready to go.
|
| While you're at it I seriously recommend creating 4 or 5
| "logical drives" or partitions. If you're into movies and stuff,
| make one or two big, and the others smaller. It'll be like
| having 5 small filing cabinets instead of one. IOW, a LOT easier
| to manage/find stuff.
| I have 16 partitions on my 40GB drive and I am VERY happy with
| this arrangement.
|
|
|
| --
| thanatoid-Tip® #24 (a silly joke because I can't come up with
| anything)
| How does an Englishman know his wife is dead?
| The sex is just the same but the dishes are piling up in the
| kitchen.
 
K

Ken Blake, MVP

Yes, especially on such a small drive, but on any size drive, having
anywhere near as many as 16 partitions is, in my view, *way* overkill for
most people. If the person who has this arrangement is happy with it, I
won't try to talk him out of it, but it's a very poor plan for the vast
majority of people.

But I don't agree that multiple partitions are not a good plan for most
people. Certainly, if you're booting multiple operating systems you need one
partition for each. The other common use of multiple partitions is to
support your backup scheme. If you regularly backup data but not the
operating system and installed software, backing up the data is generally
easier if it's in a partition of its own.
 
T

thanatoid

'thanatoid' wrote:
| While you're at it I seriously recommend creating 4 or 5
| "logical drives" or partitions. If you're into movies and
| stuff, make one or two big, and the others smaller. It'll
| be like having 5 small filing cabinets instead of one.
| IOW, a LOT easier to manage/find stuff.
| I have 16 partitions on my 40GB drive and I am VERY happy
| with this arrangement.
_____

And I'll bet you file in sub-folders labeled A, B, C, D ...
and JAN, FEB, MAR, APR ...

Phil Weldon

While the CORRECT way to do it is to have EVERYTHING in a nice
90GB directory (sorry, FOLDER) called "My Documents", right?
SIGH...

No, labeling everything A, B, C, D, etc, would be confusing
since the partitions use letters for ID's, and all letters up to
Z are available (something you may not have known). I've only
ever gotten up to R.

Not that you REALLY care, but I prefer to use descriptive names
for my directories, such as "alpha", "email", "catalogs", "net
data", "utils", "pubs", "online $", "stupid Usenet posts", etc.

Regards,
t.
 
P

Phil Weldon

'thanatoid' wrote:
| While the CORRECT way to do it is to have EVERYTHING in a nice
| 90GB directory (sorry, FOLDER) called "My Documents", right?
| SIGH...
|
| No, labeling everything A, B, C, D, etc, would be confusing
| since the partitions use letters for ID's, and all letters up to
| Z are available (something you may not have known). I've only
| ever gotten up to R.
|
| Not that you REALLY care, but I prefer to use descriptive names
| for my directories, such as "alpha", "email", "catalogs", "net
| data", "utils", "pubs", "online $", "stupid Usenet posts", etc.
_____

No sense of humor
no sense of proportion
no sense.

I am sure you are happy with the file cabinet metaphor; nothing so hard to
get rid of as an idea kept past its time.

Phil Weldon

| |
| > 'thanatoid' wrote:
| >| While you're at it I seriously recommend creating 4 or 5
| >| "logical drives" or partitions. If you're into movies and
| >| stuff, make one or two big, and the others smaller. It'll
| >| be like having 5 small filing cabinets instead of one.
| >| IOW, a LOT easier to manage/find stuff.
| >| I have 16 partitions on my 40GB drive and I am VERY happy
| >| with this arrangement.
| > _____
| >
| > And I'll bet you file in sub-folders labeled A, B, C, D ...
| > and JAN, FEB, MAR, APR ...
| >
| > Phil Weldon
|
| While the CORRECT way to do it is to have EVERYTHING in a nice
| 90GB directory (sorry, FOLDER) called "My Documents", right?
| SIGH...
|
| No, labeling everything A, B, C, D, etc, would be confusing
| since the partitions use letters for ID's, and all letters up to
| Z are available (something you may not have known). I've only
| ever gotten up to R.
|
| Not that you REALLY care, but I prefer to use descriptive names
| for my directories, such as "alpha", "email", "catalogs", "net
| data", "utils", "pubs", "online $", "stupid Usenet posts", etc.
|
| Regards,
| t.
 
T

thanatoid

But I don't agree that multiple partitions are not a good
plan for most people. Certainly, if you're booting multiple
operating systems you need one partition for each. The
other common use of multiple partitions is to support your
backup scheme. If you regularly backup data but not the
operating system and installed software, backing up the
data is generally easier if it's in a partition of its own.

Now there's a step in the right direction. A very small step,
but still...

Here's a link to another MVP's site which explains the partition
issue rather well.

http://www.aumha.org/a/parts.htm

Well worth reading by EVERYONE who owns a computer.
 
T

thanatoid

'thanatoid' wrote:
| While the CORRECT way to do it is to have EVERYTHING in a
| nice 90GB directory (sorry, FOLDER) called "My Documents",
| right? SIGH...
|
| No, labeling everything A, B, C, D, etc, would be
| confusing since the partitions use letters for ID's, and
| all letters up to Z are available (something you may not
| have known). I've only ever gotten up to R.
|
| Not that you REALLY care, but I prefer to use descriptive
| names for my directories, such as "alpha", "email",
| "catalogs", "net data", "utils", "pubs", "online $",
| "stupid Usenet posts", etc.
_____

No sense of humor
no sense of proportion
no sense.

Excellent description of yourself. Got it from an unfriendly
therapist?
I am sure you are happy with the file cabinet metaphor;
nothing so hard to get rid of as an idea kept past its
time.

I used a metaphor everyone can understand. And please don't tell
me you don't have any paper in your house. Instead of using a
file cabinet or cardboard boxes, you may prefer to wade through
piles of sheets of it strewn all over your floor, but that's an
individual choice.

BTW:
1.
Yours is perhaps the first post I've seen which manages to top-
post and bottom-post at the same time. Impressive.

2.
"discosed" is correctly spelled "disclosed".

Regards
t.
 
P

Phil Weldon

'thanatoid' wrote, in part:
| Excellent description of yourself. Got it from an unfriendly
| therapist?
_____

Could you give an example of 'a sense of humor'?
From your own experience?
Other than your sig 'resembling death'?

Phil Weldon

|
| >
| > No sense of humor
| > no sense of proportion
| > no sense.
|
| Excellent description of yourself. Got it from an unfriendly
| therapist?
|
| > I am sure you are happy with the file cabinet metaphor;
| > nothing so hard to get rid of as an idea kept past its
| > time.
|
| I used a metaphor everyone can understand. And please don't tell
| me you don't have any paper in your house. Instead of using a
| file cabinet or cardboard boxes, you may prefer to wade through
| piles of sheets of it strewn all over your floor, but that's an
| individual choice.
|
| BTW:
| 1.
| Yours is perhaps the first post I've seen which manages to top-
| post and bottom-post at the same time. Impressive.
|
| 2.
| "discosed" is correctly spelled "disclosed".
|
| Regards
| t.
|
| --
| thanatoid-Tip® #25
| Ten boxes with 20 objects in each one are easier to navigate
| than one box with 200 objects in it.
 
G

Guest

Since we are correcting people's grammar, you should have used "than" vs
"then" in the second line.

IMHO, 16 partitions on a 40GB drive is ridiculous. That's what folders are
for....

MD



:

There was a great article I ran across just yesterday on how
Microsoft is more then anything making people dumber (like the
mass media isn't enough). But when a "professional" argues
against partitions, one really starts to wonder where the
smart/stupid boundary lies these days. I know "most" people (let
alone new users) are incapable of even cogitating the concept of
logical drives, but the OP did not appear to be one of those, so
I gave him some good advice.

<SNIP>
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top