M
MTLavinia
I inherited a .mdb that has no documentation.
One query contains a number of fields, one, "Last Name" is sorted in
ascending order and has for criteria <"iq". I do not understand where 'iq'
comes from.
The query breaks a list of names into 2 parts, 11 names and another query
that uses >"iq" produces the remaining 12 names. The purpose of the query is
to print a specific report containing those names (and related data). The
report for the 2 separate queries is different, hence the need to break it at
that point.
If I remove the criteria then the query shows all 23 names. So 'iq' must be
controlling the count. I thougth perhaps 'iq' had a special meaning within
Access but I cannot find any info along those lines so I am stumped as to why
this query works.
There is no sequence of 'iq' characters in any records in the field.
I need to change this query because the report requirements has changed and I
need to change the number of records that are printed on each of 3 different
reports.
Does anyone have an idea of why this criteria works?
Thanks, Jon
One query contains a number of fields, one, "Last Name" is sorted in
ascending order and has for criteria <"iq". I do not understand where 'iq'
comes from.
The query breaks a list of names into 2 parts, 11 names and another query
that uses >"iq" produces the remaining 12 names. The purpose of the query is
to print a specific report containing those names (and related data). The
report for the 2 separate queries is different, hence the need to break it at
that point.
If I remove the criteria then the query shows all 23 names. So 'iq' must be
controlling the count. I thougth perhaps 'iq' had a special meaning within
Access but I cannot find any info along those lines so I am stumped as to why
this query works.
There is no sequence of 'iq' characters in any records in the field.
I need to change this query because the report requirements has changed and I
need to change the number of records that are printed on each of 3 different
reports.
Does anyone have an idea of why this criteria works?
Thanks, Jon