William said:
HP is a Bubble jet no good for long life Prints, only Epson can do that as its
not a Bubble Jet..
Your info is very inaccurate.
Many printers have long life prints using the original inks and papers.
Their life is equal to or better than lab prints. This applies to Canon,
Epson, Lexmark, and HP models.
When it comes to "bubble jet", that's a Canon trademark name for their
line of printers. And even though Epson is not called a bubble jet, it
does use similar inkjet droplet technology. Instead of heating the ink
bubble and firing it out a jet (thermal inkjet), the Epson uses
electricity to expand the ink droplet and fire it out the jet (piezo
inkjet).
They both use jets of ink for printing, hence the name "inkjet". The
difference is only in how the ink is forced out of the jets.
HP Running cost are very high, Canon is the lowest and Lexmark being the
worse
Again your info is inaccurate.
I have first-hand experience in this as I've owned both Canon and HP
printers and have compared their ink costs and print quality. HP running
costs are not what many people believe.
Take a look at the page yield and costs of cartridges from similar
printers. At first glance, the HP cartridges appear expensive at $50 CDN
for a tri-colour cartridge, while a single Canon ink tank is only $20.
But you need three ink tanks, not just one.