Renan said:
I will need both.
Thanks!
I should be honest and tell you that I don't use LTSpice myself, the
interface is not intuitive enough. I prefer EWB version 5c. It has a
better interface but it doesn't have the speed and precision of
LTSpice. Real engineers see EWB as a toy, as some cheap crap, and the
pros would never use EWB.
But I am more interested in having fun than in creating very good
circuits. EWB is not freeware and it is not for sale anymore ;-).
Customers who bought the newer versions of EWB wanted a copy of EWB
5.0c together with the new program, because the new program was
useless, and the company gave them the old program for free if the
customer demanded it, but I doubt they are still doing that.
You need to train for half an hour to use LTSpice, EWB is very simple
to start using immediately. Things look like a normal workbench, you
drag out the oscilloscope on the work area to use it, use the controls
just like on a real oscilloscope, wires are made by drag-n-drop from
the contact points. Push the power button to give power to the circuit
and see what happens.
Later versions of Electronics Workbench are based on a new engine and
have had problems with many bugs. Nobody has ever produced a better
spice prog than EWB5c if we value the user interface highly.
If I ever need to design a serious and complicated circuit I will use
LTSpice as a complement, to check out what happens in a really good and
modern spice simulator.
If I really worked with electronics I would learn to use LTSpice.