Executing operators through reflections

[Yahoo]

I have an object being passed into a method that I know implements the +
operator. How can I execute this method if I dont know its type?

What I want to do is...

public object Add(object o1, object o2)
{
//what needs to happen
//return o1 + o2;

//What i want to do...
return o1.getType().InvokeMember("+", new object(){o1, o2});
}



o1 and o2 would be both either a double, int, string, long, or my own
classes that implement the + operator.

 

[Mattias Sjögren]

//What i want to do...
return o1.getType().InvokeMember("+", new object(){o1, o2});
}

Custom + operators are implemented as methods called op_Addition.

o1 and o2 would be both either a double, int, string, long, or my own
classes that implement the + operator.

You'd have to special case the primitive types.


Mattias

 

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

I have an object being passed into a method that I know implements the +
operator. How can I execute this method if I dont know its type?

What I want to do is...

public object Add(object o1, object o2)
{
//what needs to happen
//return o1 + o2;

//What i want to do...
return o1.getType().InvokeMember("+", new object(){o1, o2});
}

o1 and o2 would be both either a double, int, string, long, or my own
classes that implement the + operator.

String itself doesn't implement the "+" operator - it's done by the
compiler. Double/int/long etc have MSIL instructions specifically to
add them, so again the work is done by the compiler. For your own
classes, I believe you need to find the op_Add method (or possibly
op_add - look at such a class with reflector).

 

[Yahoo]

I dont want to have a list of if statements to properly handle this. Is
there another way to solve this kind of problem?

String itself doesn't implement the "+" operator - it's done by the
compiler. Double/int/long etc have MSIL instructions specifically to
add them, so again the work is done by the compiler. For your own
classes, I believe you need to find the op_Add method (or possibly
op_add - look at such a class with reflector).

--
Jon Skeet - <[email protected]>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too


//What i want to do...
return o1.getType().InvokeMember("+", new object(){o1, o2});
}

 

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

I dont want to have a list of if statements to properly handle this. Is
there another way to solve this kind of problem?

Not that I know of, no.

You only need to have it in a single place though. Isolated ugliness is
still ugly, but it's a lot better than ugliness you need to distribute
through your code

(You could use Type.GetTypeCode and a switch statement to make it
slightly nicer, but it's still effectively special-casing each type.)

Jon