M
Mike Carter
I recently upgraded my PC at home from ME to XP pro. (dual boot using two
HDs). I frequently need to connect to the office network from home so use
RAS on our NT 4 server and DUN on the PC at home. Under ME I was able to
connect to the server, map network drives, logon to the exchange server for
email and browse the rest of the network (primarily a Workgroup of WinXX
machines).
However under XP I have not been able to browse the network (browsing
Workgroup only shows my own PC and there is no sign at all of the NT domain
name). I can find the server if I enter its name and do a search for
'computers or people', so I have been able to map drives this way. However
the only way I can see the other PCs is if I ping them but I can't find them
by name or connect to any of their resources.
The home PC is not configured to connect to a domain at start-up, but it's
workgroup name is the same as at the office. The office domain name is
included in the options tab of the Dial Up connection properties. Client for
Microsoft Networks is one of the items included under the Networking tab. On
the XP setup the only protocol running is TCP/IP with a server assigned IP
address. However, on the ME setup Netbeui is also being used for the dial-up
connection. Both protocols have permission on the server to access the
network.. The XP Internet Connection Firewall is disabled although I'm
running Zone Alarm (but this also runs under the ME setup).
There are no clues in either the local or server Event Logs. The Server
Event log shows the user (me!) logging on and being successfully
authenticated.
I've read that Netbeui is not supported under XP and even if manually
installed it can't be bound to the dial-up connection. I suspect I have a
name resolving issue and may need to configure the server with a WINS
service (and therefore presumably all the PCs to register with it!). However
I'd rather not do this if there is a simpler solution.
Any help would be greatly appreciated (apologies for the length of the post,
but I thought I'd provide as much detail as possible!).
TIA
Mike
HDs). I frequently need to connect to the office network from home so use
RAS on our NT 4 server and DUN on the PC at home. Under ME I was able to
connect to the server, map network drives, logon to the exchange server for
email and browse the rest of the network (primarily a Workgroup of WinXX
machines).
However under XP I have not been able to browse the network (browsing
Workgroup only shows my own PC and there is no sign at all of the NT domain
name). I can find the server if I enter its name and do a search for
'computers or people', so I have been able to map drives this way. However
the only way I can see the other PCs is if I ping them but I can't find them
by name or connect to any of their resources.
The home PC is not configured to connect to a domain at start-up, but it's
workgroup name is the same as at the office. The office domain name is
included in the options tab of the Dial Up connection properties. Client for
Microsoft Networks is one of the items included under the Networking tab. On
the XP setup the only protocol running is TCP/IP with a server assigned IP
address. However, on the ME setup Netbeui is also being used for the dial-up
connection. Both protocols have permission on the server to access the
network.. The XP Internet Connection Firewall is disabled although I'm
running Zone Alarm (but this also runs under the ME setup).
There are no clues in either the local or server Event Logs. The Server
Event log shows the user (me!) logging on and being successfully
authenticated.
I've read that Netbeui is not supported under XP and even if manually
installed it can't be bound to the dial-up connection. I suspect I have a
name resolving issue and may need to configure the server with a WINS
service (and therefore presumably all the PCs to register with it!). However
I'd rather not do this if there is a simpler solution.
Any help would be greatly appreciated (apologies for the length of the post,
but I thought I'd provide as much detail as possible!).
TIA
Mike